JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on August 13, 2021 (21:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good shooting point. convincing angles: -slight slope to the right -highlights and uncontested burnt lights -diaphragm too closed = diffraction Adors: -invest in a polarizing filter and an ND filter -evaluate whether to invest in a filter system with holder for f. aaalstra and circular pula -take more advantage of the deviation of exposure ... here a sub-exposure of -0.666 was already interesting (imho) Hello, Lauro Buono il punto di ripresa. aspetti non convincenti: -leggera pendenza a destra -alte luci e luci bruciate non contrastate -diaframma troppo chiuso = diffrazione
Consigli: -investire in un filtro polarizzatore e un filtro ND -valutare se investire in un sistema a filtri con holder per filtri a lastra e polarizzatore dedicato circolare -sfruttare di più la deviazione dell'esposizione ... qui una sottoesposizione di -0,666 era già interessante
sent on August 31, 2021 (16:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much Lauro! On the slope I can't tell you: I think you're right anyway. Overexposure, as for another photo, is caused by the long exposure time (to capture the effect of water) without the use of a filter. Ditto the diaphragm too closed ... Yo yes, I really have to buy a filter. By the way, can you suggest me some? On another perspective I had the Hoya pro and I would be tempted to take it again. They also suggested the Marumi brand to me. Thanks Grazie molte Lauro! Sulla pendenza non saprei dirti: mi sa che hai ragione comunque. La sovraesposizione, come per un'altra foto, è causata dal lungo tempo di esposizione (per catturare l'effetto dell'acqua) senza uso di filtro. Idem il diaframma troppo chiuso… Ebbene sì, devo proprio comprare un filtro. A proposito, puoi suggerirmene qualcuno? Su un'altra ottica avevo lo Hoya pro e sarei tentato di prenderlo di nuovo. Mi hanno anche suggerito il marchio Marumi.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
