we left ... | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Birds

11.2 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Pronti al decollo View gallery (14 photos)

we left ... sent on June 13, 2021 (17:54) by Adrianogattoni. 4 comments, 128 views.

con Kenko Pro 300 DGX 1.4x at 420mm, 1/2500 f/5.6, ISO 1250, tripod.

Obiettivo Nikon AFS 300 F4

View High Resolution 11.2 MP

2 persons like it: Manzato, S_m_art

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Elleemme

sent on June 13, 2021 (18:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A general move is palpable probably helped by the loss of the AF hook and the uneven movement of the optics in pursuit.
T correct the slight but palpable left tilt.
(imho)
Ciao, Lauro

Adrianogattoni

sent on June 13, 2021 (23:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hi Lauro, thank you again for your welcome comment.
It is not that the micromosso is a consequence of the pushed crop, that is, a loss of resolution due to the few pixels available after crop.
Cyo Hadrian 8-)

Elleemme

sent on June 13, 2021 (23:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I don't think Adriano... the basic problem is that they are not repeatable moments with a certain frequency so there are few opportunities to optimize the perhaps dynamic hooking + expansion collection of af points and find the right compromise between iso-time-diaphragm :-/
The important thing is to insist on project 8-)
(imho)
about which of the 2 optics you used and which focal point you
Hello, lauro

Adrianogattoni

sent on June 14, 2021 (8:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In this case a Nikon 300 AFS F4 with Kenko multiplier 1.4. The machine a Nikon D500 with dynamic AF set to 25 points. The other shooting parameters you see in the frame. Once hooked, Nikon should maintain the AF. The subject filmed was at a distance of about 100 meters. Hi Adriano

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.