What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 26, 2021 (11:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
a wonder. the details are excellent. una meraviglia. i dettagli sono eccellenti. |
| sent on July 26, 2021 (11:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you! Look, if you do not need the RI 1:1, this lens (also wanting with the 2X, which "holds" very well, I saw that you also commented on the photo of the grasshopper where lens comparison "smooth" and multiplied, with a minimal difference) is really exceptional: very sharp already at TA (although I usually use it at least at f / 4, but only for pdc issues), good blurry, excellent focusing speed. And calculates that I come from Canon FF with 100mm f/2.8 macro, I am very demanding. Truly a gem for "pseudo-macro" photos the 40-150mm f/2.8 pro. In this sense, the 300mm f/4 should also be excellent, but it costs and clutters more (although it allows you to get the same magnification from twice the distance, excellent with shy subjects) Grazie! Guarda, se non si ha necessità del RI 1:1, questa lente (volendo anche con il 2X, che "regge" molto bene, ho visto che hai commentato anche la foto della cavalletta dove confronto obiettivo "liscio" e moltiplicato, con una differenza minima) è veramente eccezionale: nitidissima già a TA (anche se di solito la uso almeno a f/4, ma solo per questioni di PdC), buono sfocato, ottima velocità di messa a fuoco. E calcola che vengo da FF Canon con 100mm f/2.8 macro, sono molto esigente. Veramente una chicca per foto "pseudo-macro" il 40-150mm f/2.8 pro. In tal senso dovrebbe essere eccellente anche il 300mm f/4, ma costa e ingombra di più (anche se consente di ottenere lo stesso ingrandimento dal doppio della distanza, ottimo con i soggetti timidi) |
| sent on July 26, 2021 (11:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Arnaldo thanks to you, these images are really well made, accompanied by your comments then they are very useful, they make you understand many things. A nice way to use this space and 'grow' by exchanging advice and opinions in peace
A greeting Arnaldo grazie a te, queste immagini sono veramente ben realizzate, corredate dai tuoi commenti poi sono utilissime, fanno capire molte cose. Un bel modo per utilizzare questo spazio e 'crescere' scambiando consigli e opinioni in tutta tranquillità
un saluto |
| sent on July 26, 2021 (11:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Arnaldo thanks to you, these images are really well made, accompanied by your comments then they are very useful, they make you understand many things. A nice way to use this space and 'grow' exchanging advice and opinions in peace
A greeting „
Thanks again for the beautiful words, which frame my concept of online sharing very well :-) " Arnaldo grazie a te, queste immagini sono veramente ben realizzate, corredate dai tuoi commenti poi sono utilissime, fanno capire molte cose. Un bel modo per utilizzare questo spazio e 'crescere' scambiando consigli e opinioni in tutta tranquillità
un saluto"
Grazie ancora per le belle parole, che inquadrano benissimo il mio concetto di condivisione online |
| sent on July 26, 2021 (11:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I add to what was said before: if instead you needed the RI 1:1, there is the excellent Olympus 60mm f/2.8 macro. Sure, it's much shorter than focal length and isn't a pro, but I'm told it's an excellent macro (and in fact I was pondering buying). A 100mm f/2.8 macro pro should also be on the way, which will surely be a bomb; but being a "pro" series, I'm afraid it will also be quite expensive :-D Aggiungo a quanto detto prima: se invece servisse il RI 1:1, c'è l'ottimo Olympus 60mm f/2.8 macro. Certo, è molto più corto di focale e non è un pro, ma mi dicono sia un eccellente macro (e infatti stavo meditando l'acquisto). Dovrebbe inoltre essere in arrivo anche un 100mm f/2.8 macro pro che sicuramente sarà una bomba; ma essendo un serie "pro", temo sarà anche parecchio costoso  |
| sent on July 27, 2021 (9:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks Arnaldo very kind; there is also a beautiful elmarit 45 macro, but it costs almost twice as much. :-D I took a look at the 60 and it seems really very interesting. Greetings grazie Arnaldo gentilissimo; c'è anche un bellissimo elmarit 45 macro, ma costa quasi il doppio. Ho dato un occhio al 60 e mi sembra veramente molto interessante. Un saluto |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
15.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
