What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 30, 2021 (19:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The scene is objectively very overexposed while the shooting time is too long.
-For exposure it is preferable to decide us scene x scene if it will have to submit or underexpose and how much, with static scenes we have endless possibilities for correction.
-Although we are using a tripod we must consider that with these shooting temoi we are always at risk of micromosso due to terrain, imbalance of the reflex-optic system, undersized support head better then raise the iso and work with the underexposure ... everything helps.
-The canon does not offer the manual choice of iso fractions, if we do not digest going from 400 to 800iso better upgradare, on the 1st occasion, the digital body with a more performing one and equipped with battery grip (to help ergonomics and balance (e.g. 7dm2 and/or 70d-90d)
(imho)
Ao, Lauro
La scena è oggettivamente molto sovraesposta mentre il tempo di scatto è troppo lungo.
-Per l'esposizione è preferibile decidere noi scena x scena se si dovrà sovra o sotto-esporre e di quanto, con scene statiche abbiamo infinite possibilità di correzione. 
-Anche se stiamo usando un treppiede dobbiamo considerare che con questi temoi di scatto siamo sempre a rischio di micromosso causa terreno, sbilanciamento del sistema reflex-ottica, testa di supporto sottodimensionata meglio quindi alzare gli iso e lavorare con la sottoesposizione ... tutto aiuta.
-La canon non offre la scelta manuale delle frazioni di iso, se non digeriamo passare da 400 a 800iso meglio upgradare, alla 1a occasione, il corpo digitale con uno più performante e dotato di battery grip (per aiutare l'ergonomia e il bilanciamento (es. 7dm2 e/o 70d-90d)
(imho)
Ciao, Lauro
|
| sent on May 30, 2021 (19:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks again for the useful advice, I will put into practice at the next release. Hello Grazie ancora per gli utili consigli, metterò in pratica alla prossima uscita. Ciao |
| sent on May 31, 2021 (11:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Lauro, how ug could the 850D be okay? Thank you. Ciao Lauro, come ug potrebbe andare bene la 850D? Grazie. |
| sent on May 31, 2021 (15:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As ergonomics and for me (important) the presence of joistick to quickly change the focus point by already composing in the machine ....
ok the 90d (used c/warranty) 1050-1130 euros minus the value of your used
ok the 7DmII (used c/warranty) 750 euros minus the value of your used
+ Original or compatible Battery Grip Meike-Neewer 8-) Come ergonomia e per me (importante) la presenza del joistick per cambiare rapidamente il punto di messa a fuoco componendo già in macchina ....
ok la 90d (usata c/garanzia) 1050-1130 euro meno il valore del tuo usato
ok la 7DmII (usata c/garanzia) 750 euro meno il valore del tuo usato
+ Battery Grip originale o compatibile Meike-Neewer  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
12.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
