JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on September 20, 2011 (18:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Personally, this picture does not tell me a great ... City lights seem burned, in the lower image the vegetation / beach is almost indistinguishable. Finally place the horizon in the middle of the frame is fine if you want to bring out the reflection in this photo but is null. If you have opportunity to try again you should expose at least four times: once for the city and its lights, one for the sea with reflections, one for the beach and one for the boats. Also I would try to better study the location trying to avoid the towers with smoke production or excessive chaos of the city! Hope you're not offended by the criticism but I think so you can try again with some changes in more! Personalmente questa fotografia non mi dice un granché... Le luci della città mi sembrano bruciate, nella zona in basso dell'immagine la vegetazione/spiaggia è pressoché indistinguibile. Infine l'orizzonte posto a metà del fotogramma va bene se vuoi far risaltare il riflesso ma in questa foto è nullo. Se hai occasione di riprovare ti consiglio di esporre almeno 4 volte: una per la città e le sue luci, una per il mare con i riflessi, una per la spiaggia ed una per le barche. Inoltre proverei a studiare meglio la location cercando di evitare le torri con i fumi di produzione o l'eccessivo caos cittadino!! Spero che non ti offendi per la critica ma credo che così potrai riprovare con qualche accorgimento in più!!
sent on September 20, 2011 (21:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, I do not offend absolutely OE criticisms are always welcome if costruttive.Cmq the area of ??the industrial center was volute. Greetings Ciao, non mi offendo assolutamente òe critiche sono sempre bene accette se costruttive.Cmq la zona del polo industriale era voluta. Saluti
sent on September 20, 2011 (21:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Then you have two paths: either value it with a telephoto lens isolating and perhaps leaving the single reflection, or if you want to put in opposition to nature uses a greater depth of field (f/16 for example) in order to create thickness. With f/4.5 sfuochi excessively creating their own aura in buildings. Allora hai due strade: o lo valorizzi con un teleobiettivo isolandola e magari lasciando il singolo riflesso; oppure se lo vuoi porre in contrapposizione alla natura utilizza una maggiore profondità di campo (f/16 per esempio) così da creare spessore. Con f/4.5 sfuochi eccessivamente creando proprio quell'alone negli edifici.
sent on April 15, 2013 (19:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think it is an exaggeration to f/16. It was enough to f/10 with a fire sull'iperfocale, but especially from ISO100 to take if you use a tripod. There is little to nothing in the foreground to be enhanced and the lights are too far away. In my humble opinion the photo is not great. Many times the expectations are greater with the result. We must learn to be self-critical. A greeting! Penso che f/16 sia esagerato. Bastava un f/10 con fuoco sull'iperfocale, ma soprattutto da scattare a ISO100 se usi il treppiede. C'è poco niente in primo piano da valorizzare e le luci sono troppo lontane. Secondo il mio modesto parere la foto non è un granchè. Molte volte le aspettative sono maggiori del risultato. Bisogna imparare ad essere autocritici. Un saluto!
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
