What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 01, 2021 (12:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would say good dynamic range (also here: www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=3910372&l=it). I'm giving it a little thought about the X-E4. Question: is the hyperfocal shot provided by the automatisms of the machine or do you have to count on a lens with indications of diaphragms and distances? Thank you Luigi. Giorgio Direi buona gamma dinamica (anche qui: www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=3910372&l=it ). Ci sto facendo un pensierino sulla X-E4. Domanda: lo scatto in iperfocale è previsto dagli automatismi della macchina o bisogna contare su un obiettivo con le indicazioni dei diaframmi e delle distanze? Grazie Luigi. Giorgio |
| sent on June 08, 2021 (19:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sorry I'm late in your answer. I was 10 days in the hospital. Just put the machine in the manual and since the UFO is on fixed focus you take care of it. It is a great car and, with this pancake, for the street it is unsurpassed. Scusa il ritardo nella risposta. Sono stato 10 gg. in ospedale. Basta mettere la macchina in manuale e dato che l'UFO è a fuoco fisso ci pensa lei. E' un'ottima macchina e , con questo pancake , per la street è insuperabile. |
| sent on June 08, 2021 (19:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No, wait. Tell me how you do it.... Don't you have to calculate where the hyperfocal falls?
I know everything good for health. Hello! No, aspetta. Spiegami com'è che fai.... Non devi calcolare dove cade l'iperfocale?
Spero tutto bene per la salute. Ciao! |
| sent on June 09, 2021 (11:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
On a fixed-focus lens, that is, without helical with distance scale and possibility to choose a diaphragm,
no ... is not possible (nor necessary) . The goal (we talk about this UFO) is ALWAYS in hyperfocal. Obviously meaning as hyperfocal the distance that , combined with a certain diaphragm , gives the greatest depth of field. Here the diaphragm is fixed and there is no helical. It's the great comfort of this small, slow economy. Once you have intelligently chosen ISOs, depending on environmental conditions, and this affects shooting times, everything is automatic. Dear greetings. Su di un obbiettivo a fuoco fisso , senza cioè elicoide con scala delle distanze e possibilità di scegliere un diaframma ,
no ... non è possibile (né necessaria) . L'obbiettivo (si parla di questo UFO) è SEMPRE in iperfocale. Intendendo ovviamente come iperfocale la distanza che , abbinata ad un certo diaframma , dà la maggior profondità di campo. Qui il diaframma è fisso e non esiste elicoide. E' la gran comodità di questa piccola economica lente. Una volta scelti intelligentemente gli ISO , a seconda delle condizioni ambientali , e questo condiziona i tempi di scatto , tutto è automatico. Cari saluti. |
| sent on June 09, 2021 (13:13) | This comment has been translated
Thank you! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
26.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
