JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user219927
sent on March 22, 2021 (14:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Does it look to me or is it slightly out of focus? What telescope did you use? Sembra a me oppure è leggermente fuori fuoco? Quale telescopio hai usato?
sent on March 23, 2021 (8:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I focus with bathinov on the last star of the alignment and everything was ok.. but he may have moved something later. I tend to exclude it because all sessions show the same softness. In my opinion the newton TS 203 f4 does not go very well with the 2x nikon focal multiplier which is already much better than the Barlow acre that I have => now I am trying with the smooth telescope.. Max property Io metto a fuoco con la bathinov sull' ultima stella dell' allineamento ed era tutto ok.. potrebbe però essersi mosso qualcosa dopo. Tendenzialmente lo escludo perchè tutte le sessioni manifestano la stessa morbidezza. A mio avviso il newton TS 203 f4 non va daoccordissimo con il moltiplicatore di focale 2x nikon che però è gia molto meglio della Barlow acro che ho => adesso sto provando con il telescopio liscio.. vedremo!
Max
user219927
sent on March 23, 2021 (9:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I hate multipliers precisely because of the loss of sharpness. Especially in case of "delicate" photography such as the astro. Personalemte I think a good cutout is better. Notice the stars as they are minged and have a bluish side edge. Other question, do you use Pixinsight? Io detesto i moltiplicatori proprio per la perdita di nitidezza. Soprattutto in caso di fotografia "delicata" come l'astro. Personalemte credo sia meglio un buon ritaglio. Nota le stelle come ti vengono ovattate e hanno un bordo laterale bluastro. Altra domanda, usi Pixinsight?
sent on March 24, 2021 (17:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Now I have to process about thirty poses without multiplier and moon apart apparently look cleaner although I will have to croppare more. Thist try with a good 2" barlow from a friend (cable car); mine 1.25 acre is just fine to throw your eyes into it unpretentiously! No, for now only deep space stacker PS LR Max Adesso devo elaborare una trentina di pose senza moltiplicatore e luna a parte apparentemente sembrano più pulite anche se dovrò croppare di più. Prova successiva con una barlow 2" buona di un amico (televue); la mia da 1.25 acro va giusto bene a buttarci l'occhi dentro senza pretese! No, per adesso solo deep space stacker PS LR
Max
user219927
sent on March 25, 2021 (6:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Pixinsight also has a very good new Preprocessing and has a gear n more than DSS in terms of sharpness. Test! Pixinsight ha anche un nuovo Preprocessing molto valido e ha una marcia n più rispetto a DSS in quanto a nitidezza. Prova!
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
5.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
