What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 21, 2021 (19:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Daje!! Great Oly! Daje!! Grande Oly! |
| sent on March 21, 2021 (20:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very pretty! P.S. Cesare but have you changed my kit for the umpteenth time? :-D Molto carina! P.S. Cesare ma hai cambiato per l'ennesima volta corredo? |
| sent on March 21, 2021 (20:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nooo, what do you say... :-D Nooo, ma che dici... |
| sent on March 21, 2021 (20:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The photo is cute and the 1000 iso noise of the Olympus vs the Sony 1600 is embarrassing, obviously in situations that look seemingly similar. La foto è carina e la rumorosità a 1000 iso della Olympus vs la sony a 1600 è imbarazzante, ovviamente in situazioni che sembrano apparentemente simili. |
| sent on March 21, 2021 (20:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
After a few months of film shots with the HP5... I don't see any more :-D Dopo qualche mese di scatti a pellicola con ilford HP5... Non ne vedo più rumore |
| sent on March 21, 2021 (22:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, of course, the difference remains abysmal. And Ilford is something else than digital noise. A bit like comparing a Tesla to a turbo... Si, certamente, rimane comunque abissale la differenza. E la Ilford è ben altra cosa, rispetto al rumore digitale. Un po' come paragonare una Tesla ad una uno turbo... |
| sent on March 22, 2021 (1:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well the turbo was a little can, I could tell if you compared a nice 3.5 V6 Jappo... :-D I'm not sure, the picture with Sony had been taken, I did the same treatment to this one and the result is practically the same The difference between the two machines is around the stop/stop and a half depending on the light conditions in which the dynamic range is also called Yeas it has to be said, however, that in an A3+ the difference does not exist Beh la uno turbo era un cancheretto, potevo capire se mettevi in paragone un bel 3.5 V6 Jappo... Piuttosto, la foto con la Sony era stata topazzata, ho rifatto lo stesso trattamento a questa e il risultato è praticamente uguale La differenza tra le due macchine è intorno allo stop/stop e mezzo a seconda delle condizioni di luce in cui si chiama anche la gamma dinamica C'è da dire però che in un A3+ la differenza non esiste |
| sent on March 23, 2021 (0:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
:-o :-o :-o [QUOTAS] Rather, the picture with Sony had been taken, I did the same treatment again to this one and the result is practically the same „ I'm pretty much the same???????????????? But there's a chasm on these that I see!!! There may not be this difference in the press, but still there are 2 stops and it passes difference. Visible even to the naked eye, without enlarging...   " Piuttosto, la foto con la Sony era stata topazzata, ho rifatto lo stesso trattamento a questa e il risultato è praticamente uguale" E' praticamente uguale???????????????? Ma su queste che vedo io c'è un abisso!!! Sulla stampa sicuramente potrebbe non esserci questa differenza, ma comunque ci stanno 2 stop e passa di differenza. Visibili anche ad occhio nudo, senza ingrandire... Con questa www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=3869153&l=it ce ne passano 6 di stop..... Topaz, poi...? Per fare che? A 1000 ISO? |
| sent on March 23, 2021 (0:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
That then there really shouldn't be all this difference.... Mah... Che poi in realtà non ci dovrebbe essere tutta questa differenza.... Mah... |
| sent on March 23, 2021 (1:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Then I can understand the differences, even without looking at the photos. Allora posso capire le differenze, anche senza guardare le foto. |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |