What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 26, 2021 (7:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You went wild.... Ti sei scatenato.... |
| sent on February 26, 2021 (22:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Every now and then it takes ...
Cyo Dino Ogni tanto ci vuole ...
Ciao Dino |
| sent on February 26, 2021 (22:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good detail.
The next time better to take advantage of the deviation of exposure given the hard light (subexposing for example).
are you sure you used a 16-80mm?
Cyo, Lauro Buono il dettaglio.
La prossima volta meglio sfruttare la deviazione dell'esposizione data la luce dura (sottoesponendo ad esempio).
Sei sicuro di aver usato un 16-80mm?
Ciao, Lauro |
| sent on February 26, 2021 (22:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes a 16/80 f4, the goal of the D500, the only one I have for the D7200 that I consider a great reflex, second only, precisely, to the D500.
Why are you asking me that? Anything wrong?
Ciao, Francis Sì un 16/80 f4, l'obbiettivo della D500, l'unico che ho per la D7200 che considero una gran reflex, seconda solo, appunto, alla D500.
Come mai me lo chiedi? Qualcosa non va?
Ciao, Francesco |
| sent on February 26, 2021 (22:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Let's say that even if the heron has been filmed in a controlled environment it is unusual to shoot at only 80mm without resorting to a strong cutout. ;-)
Howees you like nature photography in general and don't look for heavy/bulky optics, rate a 100-400mm sigma/tamron 8-) Diciamo che anche se l'airone è stato ripreso in ambiente controllato è insolito scattare a soli 80mm senza ricorrere ad un forte ritaglio. 
Comunque se ti piace la fotografia naturalistica in genere e non ricerchi ottiche pesanti/ingombranti valuta un 100-400mm sigma/tamron  |
| sent on February 28, 2021 (16:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, I cropped the photo but the heron was about 10 meters away, and, with an 80mm, I don't think you need a "strong cutout" to get the result you see.
As far as optics are concerned, I don't worry; you can read my kit in my profile
A greeting, Francesco
Sì, la foto l'ho ritagliata ma l'airone era a circa 10 metri, e, con un 80mm, non credo sia necessario un "forte ritaglio" per ottenere il risultato che vedi.
Per quanto riguarda le ottiche, non mi preoccupo; il mio corredo lo puoi leggere nel mio profilo
Un saluto, Francesco
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
