What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 20, 2021 (8:03) | This comment has been translated
Really nice, congratulations! |
| sent on February 20, 2021 (8:16) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful image, congratulations! |
| sent on February 20, 2021 (8:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Luigi good morning, I wondered if only I consider absurd to use iso with such high values with the consequent destruction of the file that I consider unusable even for a web use.
Forgive me if I'm critical but I think in a community you need to highlight more the alleged flaws than the beautiful beauty without a constructive examination.
I say one thing, at least for what has been my experience, light is the fundamental element in photography and if it is missing (due to bad weather or due to the time) or is excessive (due to the central hours) I personally avoid shooting, talking about bird life obviously ...
I don't remember ever using isos above 200, but only because it was the minimum when I photographed, today it starts from 100 and in some cases from 50 and I are the values I would use ?
Luigi buongiorno,mi chiedevo se solo io ritengo assurdo utilizzare iso con valori così alti con la conseguente distruzione del file che ritengo inutilizzabile anche per un utilizzo web.
Perdonami se sono critico ma credo che in una community serva più mettere in evidenza i presunti difetti che il bello bello senza una disamina costruttiva.
Io dico una cosa,almeno per quella che è stata la mia esperienza,la luce è l'elemento fondamentale nella fotografia e se questa viene a mancare (per il maltempo o per via dell'orario)oppure è eccessiva(per via delle ore centrali) personalmente evito di scattare,parlando di avifauna ovviamente...
Non mi ricordo di aver mai usato iso superiori a 200,ma solo perché era il minimo quando fotografavo io,oggi si parte da 100 ed in alcuni casi da 50 ed io sono quelli i valori che utilizzerei ?
|
| sent on February 20, 2021 (15:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I fully agree and in fact mine can be called a complete error from the photographic PDV in the strict sense; as I was about to throw it away I tried to rework it, I slightly retouched it and looking at it I just liked it so I kept it. So it's not a nature photo but just a photographic image that maybe says something. However, thank you for the opinion that I think is only right concordo pienamente ed in effetti la mia si può definire un errore completo dal pdv fotografico in senso stretto; mentre stavo per buttarla ho provato a riquadrarla, l'ho lievemente ritoccata e riguardandola mi è proprio piaciuta per cui l'ho tenuta. Quindi non è una foto naturalistica ma semplicemente un'immagine fotografica che forse dice qualcosa. Grazie comunque del parere che ritengo più che giusto |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
17.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
