RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Artistic Nude
  4. » Ops... I've had the o..... bbiettivo!!

 



ATTENTION! This gallery shows artistic nude photos, included full frontal nude, both male and female. DO NOT visit this gallery if:

1) You don't are at least 18 years old.

2) You get easily annoyed by nude photos (the definition of 'artistic nude' is rather subjective, so some photos may be unpleasing).

3) Do not visit this section if you want to see only good photos: as for every gallery, the quality of the photos goes from excellent to very bad.



If you are over 18 and you want to see these photos, click here.


To save your preference, join JuzaPhoto!



Persone

View gallery (2 photos)



Attention: the definition of 'artistic nude' is very subjective and some photos may look inappropriate.

If you don't want to see the photos or this user, click here: ignore this user




What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsupporter
sent on February 03, 2021 (9:09) | This comment has been translated

Eeeek!!!

user155906
avatar
sent on February 03, 2021 (10:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

the day men realize that women are not an animal to hunt but human beings we will all be happier. I don't know how it might seem normal to photograph the intimate parts of a stranger without her knowledge and even post it on a forum

user188508
avatar
sent on February 03, 2021 (10:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

[QUOTAS] the day when men will understand that women are not an animal to hunt but human beings we will all be happier. I do not know how it may seem normal to you to photograph the intimate parts of a stranger without her knowledge and even publish it on a forum
C O N C O R D O

avatarsenior
sent on February 03, 2021 (15:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

no dai will be agreed there i don't believe one publishes a picture so stolen

avatarsupporter
sent on February 03, 2021 (15:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well, in fact - beyond the fact that you see much worse - it is unthinkable that it is not a studied (and agreed) pose.

avatarsupporter
sent on February 03, 2021 (17:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I do not know if this photo is agreed, I think yes and the idea is very nice, but even it was not, the person is not recognizable at all so there was no violation, the shot remains valid because it still communicates something, so a little less bigots please on!!!

avatarjunior
sent on February 03, 2021 (17:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In my opinion this photo is agreed.

avatarsenior
sent on February 03, 2021 (17:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

[QUOTAS] the person is not recognizable at all so there was no violation[/QUOTAS]
See serious
Respect is a word that no longer exists?
Decency?
If it wasn't agreed not only would he be a decidedly low-level person just for the shot, but the publication would really be a paltry act.
This on the agreed photo things are different

user155906
avatar
sent on February 03, 2021 (18:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

So if I ask that women not be spied on in the intimate parts by strangers even if they are not recognizable, am I a bigot? Interesting as a concept, I would know how to define who thinks so but I avoid that would cast the ban

avatarsupporter
sent on February 04, 2021 (14:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)


avatarsenior
sent on February 04, 2021 (15:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Starting from the fact that the photo itself has nothing particularly interesting, says nothing and is quite banal, taking a similar shot in the street and publishing it is from a person who has no respect, it is not a question of bigotry but of condemnation towards a stupid attitude.
I'm not very convinced that the shot is prepared given the shooting data, but it's about photos.
The photo is made of technique and message and communication.
Three the message given is just of a laido voyeur, nor are there many on Juza of mediocre photos?
Si, if the model is consenting they remain ugly, but it goes well, if the photo is stolen it remains a fact as a person with a ridiculous morality.
Ye you also start to think about what you communicate when you share an image maybe you would take an additional stroller instead of the usual comments about asses

avatarsupporter
sent on February 04, 2021 (15:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

If this photo is stolen this is the fastest photographer in the west in my opinion, on the critical judgment of the photo I abstain because for me it wanted to be a playful photo, I'm sure. on the comments on asses is not my case since I only intervened in defense having my idea.

avatarsenior
sent on February 04, 2021 (18:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

What "prudes" comments!
I've seen a pea published in an eretion these days. No one has been outraged (now, I do not know who published it, but I am no longer there).
A long time ago, someone published a duck in the foreground, alone. The world has turned.
Now, this is a nice picture. Point.
I don't give a if caught or built. She's nice.
I don't understand the moralism and indignation that came with it.
But so much so...

avatarsenior
sent on February 04, 2021 (18:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It's not moralism, photography does a communication.
A stolen photo like this only communicates the representation of the woman as an object
E justify it is how to justify one who takes under the skirts with the microcamera on the shoe
Morally it is the same and the sharing of photos of this type stolen is squalid lida and not nice and it's time to wake up and think about what you want to say and that maybe you can be even in a little bit more than the usual voyeurs
The fact that you don't understand leaves me perplexed by the moral level of photo amateurs

user155906
avatar
sent on February 04, 2021 (20:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

What a bunch of ignoble drools ready to justify the stolen photo of a woman's intimacy because "she's nice" you're the ones pointing the finger at rape victims because "eh but with that skirt" and not supporting saying it's another thing because the real problem is always the same, considering the woman an object, an ass, a piece of fregna and that's it. If this photo is not stolen I am ready to apologize to the author but not to you defenders of objectively sexist becero. I am not talking about a consenting model who grants her body to be immortalized, it is not nudity that upsets but to consider the intimate parts of a human being as a piece of flesh to enjoy without consent.

user155906
avatar
sent on February 04, 2021 (20:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Mage I am surprised about you, filippiche is filippi against those who judge your models and then if someone steals the photo of a person's underwear "eh you are moralists" you have revealed your true nature. How sad

avatarsupporter
sent on February 04, 2021 (20:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The photo is not stolen, but not even programmed, not being in a studio, and above all not being the subjects I hired. It is not necessarily female..... With light I do not like to write dictates, but sudden moments, wax still condescension at that moment when they were observing me and I took their moment, in transparency. Deviations from what has been clarified above are and will only be the result of the minds that will manifest them, not those of those who took it. If you are kind to take away those pathetic comments I would be grateful, not out of my respect, but for that of the people she liked and the many who visited impartially, whom I both thank.

user155906
avatar
sent on February 04, 2021 (20:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I am heartened to know that it is not stolen but I am not going to delete my posts, as already mentioned I make my apologies to you for the suspicion but the rest of the comments make me extremely crap and I am not going to retract.

avatarsenior
sent on February 04, 2021 (20:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ponz, don't be surprised, that's not the case. I don't get your amazement.
E calm down!
The usual top-of-the-class lection is no use to anyone.
Don't like this or other photos?
Well.
Not published to have your consent and give you satisfaction.
In the meantime, however, avoid exploiting everything and making use of it to attack those who do not think like you.
I'm sure you're "THE PENZIERO"?
Perfect. It's your right. Do not oblige others to follow you, especially offending in the most mocking way.
I'm going to close this.

user155906
avatar
sent on February 04, 2021 (20:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

As already mentioned, the photo is not the problem but the concept expressed by you and two others that reduces a human being to a piece of meat, I do not want your approval and I do not look for it and I do not calm down, in front of certain issues you do not need calm but reaction. Having said that, I stop tedious you old drools and get free of your posts in the forum


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me