JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Photo 6 sent on January 26, 2021 (12:41) by Mtdbo. 2 comments, 264 views. Queste fotografie sono state caricate perché fanno parte di un articoletto che ho scritto su come riprodurre negativi e diapositive utilizzando un obiettivo macro. Io ho usato un 105 Micro più un ES-1 ma si può fare con qualunque obiettivop macro.
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on February 11, 2021 (21:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
yes, I agree with you 100%. This test I did to see if a brutal conversion from RAW negative to photoshop (selecting white balance from an unde exposed area and reversing the curve) gave acceptable results, and the answer is no. You need to be more calm to study, set and photograph to have a RAW negative to use. However, as a starting point, it is not bad. Handcuffing on contrast and white would improve a lot. it is probably also necessary to choose the exposure more accurately. Oth other interesting aspect of this test is that, all in all, with one click I get a jpg comparable to a scanner. with less than a hundred euros (if one already has a macro and a D850-D780) si, concordo con te al 100%. Questa prova l'ho fatta per vedere se una brutale conversione da negativo RAW in photoshop (selezione del bilanciamento del bianco da una zona non esposta ed inversione della curva) dava risultati accettabili, e la risposta è no. Occorre mettersi con più calma a studiare, settare e fotografare per avere un negativo RAW da utilizzare. E comunque come base di partenza non è malaccio. Smanettando su contrasto e bianco migliorerebbe molto. probabilmente occorre anche scegliere più accuratamente l'esposizione.
Altro aspetto interessante di questa prova è che, tutto sommato, con un click ottengo un jpg confrontabile con uno scanner. con meno di cento euro (se uno ha già un macro e una D850-D780)
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
