What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 13, 2021 (17:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This was taken by the same PdR with a Meike 6.5mm f/2.0 Circular Fisheye:
[IMG2]2288659[/IMG2]
https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?l=it&t=2288659
The difference given by the angle of view of 210°, generated by the Laowa 4mm f/2.8, against the "just" 190° of the Meike 6.5, is evident. Questa è stata presa dallo stesso PdR con un Meike 6.5mm f/2.0 Circular Fisheye:
[IMG2] 2288659[/IMG2]
www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?l=it&t=2288659
E' evidente la differenza data dall'angolo di campo di ben 210°, generato dal Laowa 4mm f/2.8, contro gli "appena" 190° del Meike 6.5. |
| sent on January 13, 2021 (18:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful!
A greeting Bellissima!
Un saluto |
| sent on January 13, 2021 (18:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Alessandro.
Good evening. Grazie Alessandro.
Buona serata. |
| sent on February 08, 2021 (14:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful
[ODDS] It is evident the difference given by the 210° field angle, generated by the Laowa 4mm f/2.8, against the "just" 190° of the Meike 6.5.[ /QUOTE]
Eh already, I also upgraded for MFT ;-) Bella
" E' evidente la differenza data dall'angolo di campo di ben 210° gradi, generato dal Laowa 4mm f/2.8, contro gli "appena" 190° del Meike 6.5."
Eh già, anche io ho fatto l'upgrade per MFT  |
| sent on February 08, 2021 (15:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Making a copy paste from another comment of mine to a photo with this goal:
This "fish eye" practically photocies backwards and, with its 210°, approaches the record of 220° held for decades by this mythological monster
https://www.google.it/search?q=nikon+6mm+f/2.8+fisheye&sxsrf=ALeKk03UMPuZPmymQJcd9GC6fJVuqAfDpw:1610555266120&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi9lZz0qZnuAhVUJMUKHRO4AyYQ_AUoAXoECBEQAw&biw=1365&bih=674
which however weighed five kilos and cost like an apartment.
I, about forty years ago, was shooting Kodachrome with an FE and three or four Nikkor Ai (which I still have and use), and drooling behind Nikon brochures.
I especially that 6mm f/2.8 hit my imagination and fantasized about the photos I could take.
Thane of passage and appreciation.
Buona Evening Facendo copia incolla da un altro mio commento a una foto con questo obiettivo:
Questo "occhio di pesce" praticamente fotografa all'indietro e, con i suoi 210°, si avvicina al record di 220° detenuto per decenni da questo mostro mitologico
www.google.it/search?q=nikon+6mm+f/2.8+fisheye&sxsrf=ALeKk03UMPuZPmymQ
che però pesava cinque chili e costava come un appartamento.
Io, circa un quarant'anni fa, scattavo delle Kodachrome con una FE e tre o quattro Nikkor Ai (che ancora ho e utilizzo), e sbavavo dietro alle brochure della Nikon.
Soprattutto quel 6mm f/2.8 colpiva la mia immaginazione e fantasticavo sulle foto che avrei potuto farci.
Grazie del passaggio e dell'apprezzamento.
Buona serata |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
13.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
