JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on May 15, 2015 (0:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find this interesting. The subject is curious, the photo a chaotic hair, which eventually in some cases can not hurt. Maybe you could find a point of recovery can make better f2. See you next time! Nick. Questa la trovo interessante. Il soggetto è curioso, la foto un pelo caotica, che alla fine in certi casi non guasta. Forse avresti potuto trovare un punto di ripresa in grado di rendere meglio a f2. Alla prossima! Nick.
sent on May 15, 2015 (15:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Nick.
I had to close more, but I was in the evening and I was photographing banquets in shadow. The setting and the point of recovery were obliged: passed both of them and ... Mxxxx or red hat! Grazie Nick.
Avrei dovuto chiudere di più, ma ero verso sera e stavo fotografando banchetti in ombra. Il setting e il punto di ripresa erano obbligati: passavamo entrambi di li e... mxxxx o berretta rossa!
sent on May 21, 2015 (9:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I try to explain better: The same step performed a bit 'more to the front car would allow you to put the tree-lined street on the left in the background, which af 2 would make the best focus. I would not have closed more. My view, however, can not take account of the reality of the scene and of the obstacles that could prevent a pdr different. Then we have to see. Perhaps the position I have in mind was worse because it was prevented from resuming good paintings inside the car. It could be a photo more beautiful but technically does not make it about a good idea. But you've made the idea. And not bad either! ;-) Provo a spiegarmi meglio: Lo stesso scatto eseguito un po' più frontale alla macchina ti avrebbe consentito di mettere il viale alberato a sinistra sullo sfondo, che a f 2 avrebbe fatto rendere meglio lo sfocato. Io non avrei chiuso di più. La mia considerazione però non può tener conto della realtà della scena e degli ostacoli che potevano impedire un pdr diverso. Poi bisogna vedere. Magari la posizione che ho in mente era peggio perché avrebbe impedito di riprendere bene i quadri all'interno dell'auto. Poteva essere una foto più bella tecnicamente ma che non rendeva merito a una buona idea. Tu invece l'idea l'hai realizzata. E neanche male! ;-)
sent on May 21, 2015 (13:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Just observations.
But it was almost a shot in lomography style: I passed, the Panda was passing and finger took almost that the brain had time to intervene .... Giuste osservazioni.
Però è stato uno scatto quasi in stile lomografia: io passavo, la Panda passava e il dito ha scattato quasi senza che il cervello avesse tempo di intervenire....
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
