JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on December 21, 2020 (13:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is a close shot with a very narrow PDC and if we decide to use a very open diarama or immobilize the subject, we petrify, modify posture + respiratory technique and set a single point af and ai-servo. :-o Oppure we use a non-macro 50mm as if it were a classic dedicated macro lens thus closing at least to f.7.1 and focusing our technique on the pupil ... here completely out of focus. :-| (imho) Ciao, Lauro E' una ripresa ravvicinata con una pdc ristrettissima e se decidiamo di usare un diaframa apertissimo o immobilizziamo il soggetto, ci pietrifichiamo, modifichiamo postura + tecnica respiratoria e impostiamo un solo punto af e ai-servo.
Oppure usiamo un 50mm non macro come se fosse un obiettivo classico dedicato macro chiudendo quindi almeno a f.7,1 e concentrando la nostra tecnica sulla pupilla ... qui completamente fuori fuoco. (imho) Ciao, Lauro
sent on December 21, 2020 (13:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for technical details. This was an attempt with 50 mm reversed. I know that fire is not very good but it seemed to me a fairly successful attempt. Ciao grazie per dettagli tecnici. Questo era un tentativo con 50 mm invertito. So che fuoco non benissimo però mi è sembrato un tentativo abbastanza ben riuscito.
sent on December 21, 2020 (15:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As surrender color and composition yes, as maf anticipated no. The nosto eye looks for fire on this eye but does not find it therefore wanders in search of an area in focus and with difficulty finds it but that is not the strategic area for the reasons mentioned above. You Can! 8-) Cyo, Lauro 8-) Come resa colore e composizione si, come maf anticipata no. Il nosto occhio cerca il fuoco su quest'occhio ma non lo trova quindi vaga alla ricerca di una zona a fuoco e con difficoltà la trova ma non è quella la zona strategica per i motivi accennati precedentemente. You Can!
Considerazione se non si vuole far raccolta di ottiche -un'ottica macro da 50-70-90/105mm può essere usata anche per ritratti (50mm max 70mm anche x street) -un'ottica per ritratti e/o street avrebbe delle limitazioni per essere usata come ottica macro (imho)
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
