RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Macro and Flora
  4. » Bellargus polyommatus

 
Bellargus polyommatus...

Macro

View gallery (1 photos)



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsupporter
sent on December 02, 2020 (16:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Not bad, but it seems to me that a little more parallelism would have given the second-hander the chance to become more readable as well.

avatarjunior
sent on December 02, 2020 (17:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

You're right Pigi, the problem is that the back-to-back side was slightly different, and with 180+ tc the depth of field is very small. Thank you, however, for your comment.

avatarsenior
sent on December 02, 2020 (22:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The composition is excellent,;
sharpness has some limits, but just fix the shot and things work out.
E. of the EF 1.4 x canon there was no need, considering the stand ;-) ,
diaphragm from F11 to f16, consequent increase in shooting time,
e if we want reduction of iso.
Also consider that licenids are difficult to photograph,
and the first macro attempts almost always go empty.
Let's wait for the next
greeting you


avatarjunior
sent on December 02, 2020 (22:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A greeting to you, Ghent, and thank you for your contribution.
The tc I used it to make the background more homogeneous and therefore pleasant: the greater the focal, the lower the pdc. I preferred not to close the diaphragm too much to avoid diffraction phenomena resulting in loss of sharpness. Finally, the shooting time was not possible to increase it due to the continuous gusts of wind.

avatarsupporter
sent on December 03, 2020 (16:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

[QUOTAS] I preferred not to close the diaphragm too much to avoid diffraction phenomena
I still have the 180 Canon although Now I no longer use it for a mechanical reason (the barrels that flow inside the groove on the ring to lock it at the easel) and the assistance told me that it no longer had spare parts, so I switched to something else. Believe me I used it several times even at f18 but it never gave me any problems, a very good lens.

avatarjunior
sent on December 03, 2020 (18:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Pigi (sorry I don't know your name) I also used it to more closed diaphragms, but in general I prefer to use for optics generally intermediate diaphragms convinced that they give their best there. My impression is that already at f:11 there is already a minimum of degradation. By the way used on the 40d, i.e. an apsc, I always had the impression that the PDC was enough. It was the time when Juza (Emanuele) often used the 180 Canon even multiplied by 1.4x, and I seem to remember that it was he himself who indicated those diaphragms.
But is the target out of production? Why don't they have spare parts?

avatarsupporter
sent on December 06, 2020 (17:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

very nice this too.. I've never tried macros. I don't even know where to start. thank you for your nice comment but I was wrong there is also another photo of skomer in my gallery in my most beautiful opinion. go see if you find it and have a good time. indeed sorry there are two more


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me