What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 17, 2020 (15:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The veil is a bad beast to take back... any details about the equipment used? La velo è una brutta bestia da riprendere... qualche dettaglio sull'attrezzatura utilizzata? |
| sent on November 17, 2020 (15:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi, I'm a sum of photos taken at the time of canon 350D.
I went to retrieve the folder to see the metadata and the goal was the infamous 70-300 apo.
The poses were made with the HEQ5, magzero self-driving chamber in B/N mounted a skywatcher 100 /5 acre.
Times vary from 60sec to over 300sec (but then the sky cleared too much.
Iso 400 (which for the 350D was already an extreme limit) and focal 190mm.
's crap compared to what you see around, mostly made from dark skies. :-D
Ciao, sono una somma di foto fatte ai tempi della canon 350D.
Sono andato a recuperare la cartella per vedere i metadati e l'obiettivo era il famigerato sigma 70-300 apo usato a f/8.
Le pose erano state fatte con la HEQ5 syntrek, camera autoguida magzero in B/N montata uno skywatcher 100 f/5 acro. (ricordo che il programmino per guidare, che andava per la maggiore, era PHD)
I tempi sono variabili da 60sec a oltre 300sec (ma poi il cielo si schiariva troppo).
Iso 400 (che per la 350D era già un limite estremo) e focale 190mm.
E' una schifezza rispetto a quello che si vede in giro fatte, soprattutto, da cieli bui. 
|
| sent on November 17, 2020 (16:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the subject is not the easiest, with that equipment you could not expect much more... but was the 350D modified? il soggetto non è dei più facili, con quell'attrezzatura non potevi pretendere molto di più... ma la 350D era modificata? |
| sent on November 17, 2020 (16:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
look, I think so.
idic it seems to me because at the time I had two 350Ds, one normal and the other without fitro but with the addition of an astronomik eos-clip L-filter, which did the same work as the most famous baader.
I remember that North America, I took it back with the modified one, while M42 I had made it with the normal one.
this seems to me that I had already used the one with the modification, also because, with the other, I think not even that little that is there would have come out. guarda, mi sembra di si.
dico mi sembra perchè all'epoca avevo due 350D, una normale e l'altra senza fitro ma con l'aggiunta di un astronomik eos-clip L-filter, che faceva lo stesso lavoro del più famoso baader.
ricordo che la nord america, l'ho ripresa con quella modificata, mentre M42 l'avevo fatta con quella normale.
questa mi pare che avessi già usato quella con la modifica, anche perchè, con l'altra, credo non sarebbe uscito nemmeno quel poco che c'è. |
| sent on November 17, 2020 (16:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
yes, the M42 is within reach of any machine, just be careful not to saturate the trapezoid... ;-) si, l'M42 è alla portata di qualunque macchina, basta stare attenti a non saturare il trapezio...  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
