What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 22, 2013 (23:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As always Fabio take your breath away ..! Congratulations:-P Come sempre Fabio da togliere il fiato..!!! Complimenti  |
| sent on February 22, 2013 (23:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks :-) Manolito
I have 25 movies to process more of that evening, so just finished ride on a small animated gif that will see the transit of the satellite, resulting in the output from the globe, as well as the transit of eclipses. Grazie Manolito
Ho 25 filmati da elaborare sempre di quella serata, così appena terminati, monterò una piccola gif animata che farà vedere il transito del satellite, con la conseguente uscita dal globo, nonchè il transito dell eclissi. |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (6:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
show! spettacolo!!! |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (9:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
this also fantastic! satisfy my curiosity ... with a 150 mm refractor (such as takahashi that should be among the best) could you do better? ... in essence, the refractor (although smaller diameter) is able to obtain better results on equal terms? or the difference in diameter between the C11 and a 15 cm apochromatic do you feel?? (Of course the cost of takahashi is higher:-D!) fantastica anche questa!! toglimi una curiosità...con un rifrattore da 150 mm (tipo il takahashi che dovrebbe essere tra i migliori) riusciresti a fare di meglio??...in sostanza, il rifrattore (anche se di diametro inferiore) riesce ad ottenere risultati migliori a parità di condizioni?? oppure la differenza di diametro tra il C11 e un 15 cm apocromatico si fa sentire?? (di sicuro il costo del takahashi è superiore  !!) |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (9:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride and comments Gianlu and Marco :-)
X Mark
To answer your question I tell you now that with the takahashi 150 mm (a bomb to the deep) you can not get the resolution in arc seconds of a C11, because the diameter is much lower and therefore the light that enters.
A C11 as any telescope mirror, have an obstruction that varies according to the size of the secondary mirror, in the case of a C11 is about 32%, therefore the mirror by 28 cm of C11 obstructed, would enter as much light as a refractor more than 200 mm, then it would take a refractor of that size to get those details (like the tec 200 mm which costs € 20,000).
Counts also have to work to very high focal lengths, so a refractor to have at least one focal F 10 sarebband a long tube, unmanageable by most of the frames "by amateur". Grazie del passaggio e dei commenti Gianlu e Marco
X Marco
Per rispondere alla tua domanda ti dico subito che con Il takahashi da 150 mm ( una bomba per il deep) non puoi raggiungere la risoluzione di in Arco secondi di un C11, perchè il diametro è nettamente inferiore e quindi anche la luce che entra.
Un C11 come qualsiasi telescopio ha specchio, hanno un ostruzione che varia in base alla grandezza dello specchio secondario, nel caso di un C11 è circa del 32% ,pertanto lo specchio da 28 cm del C11 ostruito, farebbe entrare tanta luce quanto un rifrattore da oltre 200 mm, quindi ci vorrebbe un rifrattore di quelle dimensioni per raggiungere quei dettagli (tipo il tec da 200 mm che costa 20.000 euro).
Conta inoltre che bisogna lavorare a focali molto alte, quindi un rifrattore per avere almeno una focale a F 10 sarebbe un tubo lunghissimo, ingestibile dalla maggior parte delle montature " da astrofilo". |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (11:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Fabio for the accurate answer! for information observatory Cavezzo have a C14 ;-) Grazie mille Fabio per la risposta precisa!! a titolo informativo all'osservatorio di Cavezzo hanno un C14  |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (13:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Imagine Marco :-)
The C 14 could be my next abbiettivo, allowing crisis:-D Figurati Marco
Il C 14 potrebbe essere il mio prossimo abbiettivo, crisi permettendo |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (15:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Simply fantastic! Hello Tiziana Semplicemente fantastica!! Ciao Tiziana |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (16:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Spectacular to say the least, congratulations! Spettacolare a dir poco,complimenti! |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (17:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fantastic picture. Big picture Fantastica immagine. Grande foto |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (17:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride and comments Tiziana, Sickboy and Massimo :-) Grazie del passaggio e dei commenti Tiziana, Sickboy e Massimo |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (18:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Exceptional! Eccezionale! |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (19:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
1000 Thanks Robert! Grazie 1000 Roberto ! |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (20:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
wow! azzzz .... better than those of NASA!  azzzz.... meglio di quelle della nasa! |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (20:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful. hello Molto bella. ciao |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (20:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride and appreciation Beppe and Gianscatto :-) Grazie del passaggio e degli apprezzamenti Beppe e Gianscatto |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (22:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Spectacular congratulations! Spettacolare complimenti! |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (22:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Spidergreen, very kind :-) Grazie Spidergreen, gentilissimo |
| sent on February 24, 2013 (10:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very good shot, all my respect for these fantastic shots, a salutone gran bella ripresa, tutta la mia stima per questi scatti fantastici, un salutone |
| sent on February 24, 2013 (10:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride and appreciation Franco :-) Grazie del passaggio e del apprezzamento Franco |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
