What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 23, 2013 (8:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice composition, shooting point, the effect muffled and special colors. I reduced only moved some hair acting on the diaphragm or on the iso. (Imho) hello and good light, laurel Piacevoli la composizione, il punto di ripresa, l'effetto ovattato e le particolari cromie. Avrei ridotto solo il mosso di alcune chiome intervenendo sul diaframma o sugli iso. (imho) ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (15:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Lauro Thanks for your visit and your comment, you're right blur of hair disturbing, the day was clear and therefore suitable IR but windy. The filter Hoya R72 is from about 10-11 stop and, to minimize the noise, should not raise the ISO over 100-200, although the D700 is very favorable in this respect. Stopped down to f/11, with these settings, the times are of the order of 25-30 seconds, also opening at f / 2.8 will not fall below 1.2'' and therefore not sufficient to eliminate the blur but, dramatically reducing the DoF. Moral ... with IR filters type the R72 should not take on windy days. I'm considering buying a digital dated and inexpensive to convert to all 'infrared. Greetings and good photos. Gian Antonio Grazie Lauro della visita e della tua osservazione, hai ragione il mosso delle chiome disturba, la giornata era limpida e quindi adatta all'IR ma, ventosa. Il filtro Hoya R72 è da 10-11 stop circa e, per ridurre al minimo il rumore, conviene non alzare gli ISO oltre 100-200, anche se la D700 è molto favorevole sotto questo aspetto. Chiudendo il diaframma a f/11, con queste impostazioni, i tempi risultano dell'ordine di 25-30 secondi, anche aprendo a f/2,8 non scenderebbero sotto 1-2'' e quindi non sufficienti ad eliminare il mosso ma, riducendo drammaticamente la DoF. Morale...con filtri IR tipo l'R72 non conviene scattare in giornate ventose. Sto valutando di acquistare una digitale datata ed economica da far convertire all' infrarosso. Saluti e buone foto. Gian Antonio |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (16:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm sorry but you are using a lady ff the 200.320 or 400 iso do the tickling. Sure it's not a stake mental iso? ... we all have but try next time to do a manual breacheting fractions of iso and try to post them ... you may find that your perception of noise differs from the majority of visitors ;-) hello, laurel scusami ma stai usando una signora f.f. i 200,320 o 400 iso le fanno solletico . Sicuro che non sia un paletto mentale l'iso ? ... tutti lo abbiamo ma prova la prossima volta a fare un breacheting manuale di frazioni di iso e prova a postarle ... potresti scoprire che la tua percezione di rumore si discosta dalla maggioranza dei visitatori ciao, lauro |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (19:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Why not ... thank you for the suggestion, the next opportunity will experience with this technique and then see the results. Hello, see you soon. GA Perchè no...ti ringrazio del suggerimento, la prossima occasione sperimenterò con questa tecnica e poi vedremo i risultati. Ciao, a presto. GA |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |