JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 23, 2020 (23:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good colors. The shot is very borderline as an interpretation between "super set naturalistic" and "natural landscape". The possibility of a more appropriate 70-300mm materializing on very open spaces where you can not take advantage of the zoom foot is so much 8-) A panoramic cut could be evaluated by excluding a part in the foreground and slightly above it could become more functional at the compositional level ;-) . Consiglio: In dynamic scenes it is better to look for faster shooting times at the cost of raising isos. (imho) Ciao, Lauro Buoni i colori. Lo scatto è molto borderline come interpretazione tra "naturalistico super ambientato" e "paesaggio naturale" . La possibilità che si materializzasse un 70-300mm più consono su spazi molto aperti dove non si può sfruttare il piedi-zoom è tanta Si potrebbe valutare un taglio panoramico escludendo una parte in primo piano e leggermente sopra potrebbe diventare più funzionale a livello compositivo . Consiglio: In scene dinamiche meglio ricercare tempi di scatto più rapidi a costo di alzare gli iso. (imho) Ciao, Lauro
sent on October 24, 2020 (13:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much for your appreciated opinion Lauro. In fact I had to make do with the 24-70 because the 70-300 tamron was not working properly with the Sony A7 III and the white Canon had not yet arrived :-D. Something I recovered by modifying and modifying in the car playing between FF and APS-C bringing the "poor" sigma to 105 :-D but between that and the polarizer adjustment, it was already a nice one to do... Considering I was on the boat for a group trip I was certainly not in optimal condition. On the Isos I agree, I could have put 400 or 800 in fact, but I wouldn't have gotten up much because of the almost certain crop I would have to take on a lot of shots precisely because of the limited focal point. Howees the advice is always welcome :-) Grazie mille per la tua apprezzata opinione Lauro. In effetti mi sono dovuto arrangiare col 24-70 perchè il 70-300 tamron non funzionava correttamente con la Sony A7 III e il bianchino Canon non mi era ancora arrivato :-D . Qualcosa ho recuperato modificando e rimodificando in macchina giocando tra FF e APS-C portando il "povero" sigma a 105 :-D ma tra quello e l'aggiustamento del polarizzatore, già era un bel da fare... Considerando che ero in barca per una gita di gruppo non mi trovavo certo in condizioni ottimali. Sugli iso concordo, avrei potuto anche mettere 400 o 800 in effetti, ma non avrei alzato molto per via del crop quasi certo che avrei dovuto fare su molti scatti proprio in virtù della focale limitata. Comunque i consigli sono sempre ben graditi :-)
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
9.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
. 
