Untitled Photo | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

Resize to fit window

Montagna View gallery (9 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on September 16, 2011 (4:30) by Silvano.gasparini. 4 comments, 700 views.

at 18mm, 1/2500 f/20.0, ISO 100, tripod.

Nikon D90, Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR, 3" f/20, ISO 100, treppiede -Monte Civetta-

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Zioigor

sent on September 23, 2011 (16:46)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

L'effetto dei 3'' sull'acqua è riuscito, trovo la chiusura eccessiva a 20. Avrei tentato uno scatto ravvicinato stringendo su qualche sasso visto che avevi il 105. Buona luce! Igor

The effect of 3'' water is managed, I find the over-restrict to 20. I tried a tight close-tightening on some rocks saw that you had the 105. Good light! Igor

Gabro

sent on September 23, 2011 (17:12)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Concordo con igor e aggiungo che manca di dettaglio, forse li diaframma cosi chiuso ha fatto perdere molta qualità!

I agree with igor and add that lacks detail, so maybe I closed diaphragm did lose a lot of quality!

Silvano.gasparini

sent on September 23, 2011 (19:03)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

purtroppo c'era moltissima luce e non avendo filtri oltre che il solito uv non potevo far altro che chiudere per ottenere un effetto discreto..per il dettaglio forse sbaglio io a salvare le foto per il web, perchè l'originale è apposto! grazie ad entrambi!

unfortunately there was a lot of light and not having the usual UV filters as well as I could not help but to achieve a discrete close attention to detail .. maybe I'm wrong to save your photos to the web, because the original is alright! thanks to both of you!

user612

sent on November 07, 2012 (0:35)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Bella la composizione, ma manca anche un pò di sturazione. Ciao

Beautiful composition, but lacks a bit of sturazione. Hello

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.