What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 14, 2020 (20:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good composition and shooting point.
Sy's review of the pre-take approach... ok first pulse shot but should follow at least another 2-3 reasoned shots to tame/control the situation.
Here is the general overexposure with large burnt areas (irrecoverable areas - without detail).
To next time take advantage of the plus key /- (exposure deviation) and sets diaphragm priority, here at least a compensation value of -1,000 maybe even -0.666 8-) was needed.
(imho)
Hello, Lauro Buoni la composizione e il punto di ripresa.
Da rivedere l'approccio nel prescatto... ok primo scatto d'impulso ma dovrebbero seguire almeno altri 2-3 scatti ragionati per domare/controllare la situazione.
Qui è plateale la sovraesposizione generale con ampie zone bruciate (= zone irrecuperabili - senza dettaglio).
La prossima volta sfrutta di più il tasto +/- (deviazione dell'esposizione) e imposta priorità di diaframma, qui serviva almeno un valore di compensazione pari a -1,000 forse anche -0,666 
(imho)
Ciao, Lauro |
| sent on October 15, 2020 (18:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for your helpful suggestions.
Undoubtedly I exaggerate with the overexpopositions, but in this case I wanted to express a soft, evanescent atmosphere, which I could hardly have achieved with a more realistic and technically correct photo.
Aeo. Rita. Ti ringrazio per gli utili suggerimenti.
Indubbiamente io esagero con le sovraesposizioni, ma in questo caso volevo esprimere un'atmosfera soffusa, evanescente, che difficilmente sarei riuscita ad ottenere con una foto più realistica e tecnicamente corretta.
Ciao. Rita. |
| sent on October 15, 2020 (20:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The basic problem is that evanescence must not enhance the large burnt areas, the measure must be taken.
the situation was static, there was no risk of losing the Tram so to enhance an almost dreamlike atmosphere it was necessary to try fork subexpositions ex -0.666 - 1.00 etc.
Do we have to help the reflex to help us
the REFLEX interprets the light in the scene but does not see the scene and does not know what we want to emphasize 8-)
(imho)
Ciao, lauro Il problema di base è che l'evanescenza non deve esaltare-accentuare delle vaste zone bruciate , bisogna prendere la misura.
La situazione era statica, non si rischiava di perdere il Tram quindi per esaltare un'atmosfera quasi onirica serviva provare delle sottoesposizioni a forcella esempio -0.666 - 1.00 etc.
Dobbiamo aiutare la reflex ad aiutarci , ok?
La reflex interpreta la luce nella scena ma non vede la scena e non sa che cosa noi vogliamo enfatizzare
(imho)
Ciao, lauro |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
5.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
