What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 14, 2020 (20:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's a situation with many elemetes - three-dimensional environment
it was wiser to close the diaphragm at least to f.8-f9 to increase the depth of field and this at the cost of raising the iso and applying a subexposition to give thickness to the sky (here missing).
Advice:
- let's not be in a hurry
- we look for more functional shooting points, here back you could start from the bottom two more trees
- Let's always take advantage of the 4 parameters present in the reflex ... diaphragm, iso, exposure compensation and shooting time
;-)
(imho)
Hello, lauro E' una situazione con molti elemeti = ambiente tridimensionale
era più saggio chiudere il diaframma almeno a f.8-f9 per aumentare la profondità di campo e questo a costo di alzare gli iso e applicando una sottoesposizione per dare spessore al cielo (qui mancante).
Consigli:
- cerchiamo di non avere fretta
- ricerchiamo punti di ripresa più funzionali , qui arretrando si potevano far partire dal basso altri due alberi
- Sfruttiamo sempre i 4 parametri presenti nella reflex ... diaframma, iso, compensazione dell'esposizione e tempo di scatto
(imho)
Ciao, lauro |
| sent on October 15, 2020 (18:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you also for these tips.
As far as the choice of shooting point is concerned, in the original photo I had also framed the base of the trees in the foreground. but then I chose to cut out the frame to better focus the point of view of those walking in a forest.
Ciao, Rita. Grazie anche per questi consigli.
Per quanto riguarda la scelta del punto di ripresa, nella foto originale avevo inquadrato anche la base degli alberi in primo piano. ma poi ho scelto di ritagliare l'inquadratura per focalizzare meglio il punto di vista di chi cammina in un bosco.
Ciao, Rita. |
| sent on October 15, 2020 (20:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If it may be useful to you, the focal length of the human eye is between 17 and 24mm (equated to the 35mm "FF")
18mm focal format used on this occasion are equated to the 35mm format at 28.8mm :-)
Evaluously evaluate the future purchase of a supergrandangular as the 10-18mm is stm
equivale at 16-28.8mm
day also useful in urban shots "urbex" ;-)
ciao, Lauro Se può esserti utile , la lunghezza focale dell'occhio umano é compresa tra i 17 e i 24mm (equiparati al formato 35mm "FF")
18mm di focale usati in questa occasione sono equiparati al formato 35mm a 28,8mm 
Valuta quindi l'acquisto futuro di un supergrandangolare come il 10-18mm is stm
equivale a 16-28,8mm
torna utile anche nei scatti urbani "urbex"
ciao, Lauro |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
11.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
