What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 05, 2020 (19:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
fantastic, maybe a little "kneaded" for noise reduction, however very nice fantastica, forse un po "impastata" per la riduzione del rumore, comunque molto bella |
| sent on October 05, 2020 (19:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
you see a bad alias on the head of the owl and also to its right si vede un brutto alias sulla testa della civetta ed anche alla sua destra |
| sent on October 05, 2020 (19:30) | This comment has been translated
Nice, congrats |
| sent on October 06, 2020 (6:09) | This comment has been translated
Excellent, congratulations! |
| sent on October 06, 2020 (8:02) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
| sent on October 06, 2020 (12:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I was there in August and already around 5pm for me that photographer with refractor was impossible to capture it. I don't know what time this was taken, but I understand it was already in the shadows. Even mine lacks background, a pity for such a beautiful subject but the location is that good or bad. And even in the sun cmq you have to get your hands on the PP. Useless on a stationary subject but probably hoping to catch it in the air. The cmq subject is portrayed well ;-) Ci sono stato ad Agosto e già intorno alle 17 per me che fotografo con rifrattore era impossibile immortalarla. Non so a che ora sia stata scattata questa ma mi sembra di capire che fosse già in ombra. Anche la mia manca di sfondo, un peccato per un soggetto così bello ma la posizione è quella bene o male. E anche al sole cmq bisogna metter mano alla PP. Avrei abbassato i tempi di esposizione. Inutili su un soggetto fermo ma probabilmente speravi di coglierla in volo. Il soggetto cmq è ritratto bene |
| sent on October 08, 2020 (15:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Nenio , in fact you are right in the PP first in CR with the brush to try to recover a little shadows then later in PS "selecting" only the subject to increase its sharpness I did not notice this alias... I believe that I will cancel it and redo the PP. For Giorgio2862 in fact at the end of September the perches were already in the shade at about 16:30 , but luckily it came down even earlier allowing me to portray it even in the light.... I posted for now this in the shade because I did not mind the "mood" Thanks to: Albieri Sergio, Alessandro Cirillo, Fabio.Schiari, Pallotta Luigi, Robge1966, Simone Padovani, Spanu Luigi, Zolikron Giorgio2862 and Nenio for the vision and comments Grazie Nenio ,in effetti hai ragione nella PP prima in CR con il pennello per tentaredi recuperare un pò le ombre poi dopo in PS "selezionando" solamente il soggetto per aumentarne la nitidezza non mi sono accorto di questo alias... Credo comunque che la cancellerò e rifarò la PP. Per Giorgio2862 in effetti a fine settembre i posatoi andavano già in ombra verso le 16,30 ,ma per fortuna è venuta giù anche prima permettendomi di ritrarla anche in luce.... ho postato per ora questa in ombra perchè non mi dispiaceva il "mood" Grazie a: Albieri Sergio, Alessandro Cirillo, Fabio.Schiari, Pallotta Luigi, Robge1966, Simone Padovani, Spanu Luigi, Zolikron Giorgio2862 e Nenio per la visione e i commenti |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |