JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on August 24, 2020 (20:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Tips: -currency to use in the future a digital photo compact but with a sensor that allows you to have more quality (e.g. panasonic lx-100 used) -shooting point ... as low as possible, the maximum would be at the height of their eyes. Here, even if only 1-1.30 meters lower (by squatting) could increase the three-dimensionality of the coots by contextualizing them more and thus reducing the dominant shooting point. ;-) (imho) Hello, lauro Consigli: -valuta di usare in futuro una digitale fotografica compatta ma con un sensore che ti permetta di avere più qualità (es.G9 X Mark II, c/sensore 1pollice, ottica equivalente a 35 mm in 28 - 84 mm, dotata di lcd, 350 eu c.a. oppure panasonic lx-100, sensore 4/3i , dotata di mirino e lcd, ottica equivalente a 35 mm in 24 - 72 mm , 490 eu c.a.) -punto di ripresa ... il più basso possibile , il massimo sarebbe all'altezza dei loro occhi . Qui anche se solo di 1-1.30metri più bassi (accovaciandoci) si poteva aumentare la tridimensionalità delle folaghe contestualizzandole di più e riducendo quindi il punto di ripresa dominante. (imho) Ciao, lauro
sent on August 24, 2020 (21:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much for the advice. I'll keep them in mind. I'm a beginner. I noticed that here you are almost all very experienced and really good, and it is very interesting to look at your photos with special attention. Hello, Cinzia Ti ringrazio molto per i consigli. Li terrò presente. Sono una principiante. Ho notato che qui siete quasi tutti molto esperti e davvero bravi, ed è molto interessante osservare le vostre foto con particolare attenzione. Ciao, Cinzia
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
oppure panasonic lx-100, sensore 4/3i , dotata di mirino e lcd, ottica equivalente a 35 mm in 24 - 72 mm , 490 eu c.a.) 
