RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Cold nights...

Notturno

View gallery (15 photos)

Cold nights sent on February 15, 2013 (0:40) by Cobarcore. 12 comments, 1933 views.

, 30 sec f/3.2, ISO 1600, tripod.

Il freddo paesaggio dell'appennino lombardo, con Orione che guarda dall'alto il ghiaccio formato dalla fine di un ruscello che lì si ferma. Scattata a Pian dell'Armà, 9 feb 2013. #NightPhotos #Notturno #Stelle





What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on February 15, 2013 (1:49)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


bella , però avrei chiuso di più il diaframma , per avere più profondità di campo

nice, but I would have closed the aperture more, to have more depth of field

avatarsenior
sent on February 15, 2013 (7:46)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Bellissimo scatto.
Complimenti, cioa.

Great shot.
Congratulations, cioa.

avatarsenior
sent on February 15, 2013 (9:49)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Grazie a entrambi!

@Nardo: coi parametri usati ho fuoco vicino a 1.9 m (secondo DOF calculator), e guardando la foto non mi pare che il primo piano sia sfocato. Se avessi chiuso di più avrei certamente perso molto nella visibilità delle stelle, non trovi?

Thank you both!

@ Nardo with the parameters I used fire near 1.9 m (second DOF calculator), and looking at the picture I do not think the foreground is blurred. If I had closed more I certainly lost a lot in the visibility of the stars, is not it?

avatarjunior
sent on February 15, 2013 (10:16)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Molto bello?complimenti

Very nice? Compliments

avatarsenior
sent on February 15, 2013 (11:31)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


io invece avrei tentato di fare un doppio scatto e poi fondere l'immagine... una per il primo piano a 100 iso e una per il cielo stellato mettendo a fuoco sulle stelle... a mio avviso il risultato del cielo sarebbe stato migliore perche così come è ora le stelle non sono molto a fuoco Cool

Matteo.

but I would try to make a double click and then merge the image ... one for the first floor at 100 iso and the starry sky by focusing on the stars ... I think the result would have been better because of the sky as it is now the stars are not very focused 8-)

Matthew.

avatarsenior
sent on February 15, 2013 (12:27)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Matteo, il doppio scatto non potevo farlo perchè questo è uno dei 500 frame che fanno parte di un timelapse. Tuttavia non mi pare che ci sia molto rumore, la 5D a 1600 iso va piuttosto bene.

Sul fuoco delle stelle, ho proprio messo a fuoco su di loro, trovando che la ghiera va girata a fine corsa (ben oltre il segno di infinito). Se la nitidezza migliore si raggiunge un po' oltre non lo posso sapere :-(

Ma sono tutti così i samy 14???



Matthew, double click could not do it because this is one of the 500 frames that are part of a timelapse. However I do not think there is a lot of noise, the 5D to 1600 ISO is pretty good.

The fire of the stars, I really focused on them and found that the ring should be turned all the way (well beyond the infinity sign). If the sharpness is reached a little better 'than I can not know :-(

But they are all so samy 14??


avatarsenior
sent on February 15, 2013 (12:45)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Nn so se sono così tutti i Sammy ma mi fa strano che sia così! Io ho postato una foto a 1600 ISO con la mia 600D e tokina 11-16 e le stelle mi risultano più puntiformi e nitide e anche il rumore non è così accentuato... Nn capisco come mai sia uscita così a te... Ma hai fatto molta PP??? Magari è quello che ti ha fregato... Fammi sapere! Sorriso

Nn I know if I am all but Sammy makes me strange that so! I've posted a photo at ISO 1600 with my 600D and tokina 11-16 and the stars to me are more point and sharp and the noise is not as pronounced ... No I understand why it output so you ... But you made a lot of PP?? Maybe that's what you stole ... Let me know! :-)

avatarsenior
sent on February 15, 2013 (12:59)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Mah, non credo di aver fatto molta PP, solo qualche parametro in camera raw. Se vuoi ti passo il raw per dagli un'occhiata.
Grazie per l'aiuto!

Well, I do not think I've done a lot of PP, only a few parameters in camera raw. If you want the raw pace to take a look.
Thanks for the help!

avatarsenior
sent on February 15, 2013 (14:06)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Sisi mi farebbe molto piacere! Caricalo e poi inviami MP che lo elaboro volentieri!

Sisi I'd love to! Upload it and then send me MP that process it again!

avatarsenior
sent on February 15, 2013 (15:00)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


MP inviato!

MP sent!

avatarsupporter
sent on February 16, 2013 (9:36)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Bella immagine, ottima atmosfera
" Sul fuoco delle stelle, ho proprio messo a fuoco su di loro, trovando che la ghiera va girata a fine corsa (ben oltre il segno di infinito). Se la nitidezza migliore si raggiunge un po' oltre non lo posso sapere :-(

Ma sono tutti così i samy 14???
"

Diciamo che la taratura della scala di maf non è il loro forte nel mio l'infinito corrisponde ai 2m.....però per il resto è davvero un'ottica molto valida;-)
Ciao

Beautiful picture, great atmosphere
On the fire of the stars, I really focused on them and found that the ring should be turned all the way (well beyond the infinity sign). If the sharpness is reached a little better 'than I can not know :-(

But they are all so samy 14??

Let's say that the calibration of the scale maf is not their strong in my infinity corresponds to 2m ..... but the rest is really very good perspective ;-)
Hello

avatarsenior
sent on February 16, 2013 (12:06)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Grazie Caterina per la tua opinione!
Riguardo al tuo samy, penso tu sia stata fortunata ad avere l'infinito a 2 m perchè così puoi trovare il punto di miglior nitidezza.
A parte questa cosa, penso anch'io sia un'ottica molto valida, pensavo davvero peggio sulla qualità ai bordi e invece è più che usabile. :-)

Thanks Catherine for your opinion!
About your samy, I think you've been lucky to have the infinite 2-m because so you can find the point of best sharpness.
Apart from this, what I think is very good perspective, I really did worse on the quality of the edges and instead is more than usable. :-)


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me