What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 21, 2020 (0:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not bad this shot, given the title I find the position of the tree unlikely.
I would try to crop the image to the left, thus bringing the tree to the crossroads of the third parties in the lower left. Non male questo scatto, visto il titolo trovo però improbabile la posizione dell'albero.
Proverei a ritagliare l'immagine a sinistra portando così l'albero sull'incrocio dei terzi in basso a sinistra. |
| sent on August 21, 2020 (10:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Peda,
I had thought of it too.
I didn't because, wanting to cut in 16:9, stinging on the left also involved cutting down some of the clouds that I liked anyway.
I tried to redo the cut in an unconstrained way, trying to keep the road on the left and adjusting the height to put the tree in the intersection at the bottom of the left.
Thoe you think?
Thanks of advice.
Ciao Peda,
ci avevo pensato anche io.
Non l'ho fatto perché, volendo tagliare in 16:9, stingere sulla sinistra comportava tagliare anche parte delle nuvole che comunque mi piacevano.
Ho provato a rifare il taglio in modo non vincolato, cercando di tenere la strada sulla sx e regolando l'altezza per mettere l'albero nell'incrocio in basso a sx.
Cosa ne pensi?
Grazie dei consigli.
|
| sent on August 21, 2020 (11:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Drugo, you understand your point of view and there it is, let's say that for the 16/9 format or anyway with a panoramic format place the tree on a third is not simple and you go to sacrifice other elements such as clouds in this second proposed photo. Ciao Drugo, si capisco il tuo punto di vista e ci sta, diciamo che per il formato 16/9 o comunque con un formato panoramico posizionare l'albero su un terzo non è semplice e si va a sacrificare altri elementi come ad esempio le nuvole in questa seconda foto proposta. |
| sent on August 22, 2020 (19:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Light and soft shadows well dosed. We also appreciate the comeback of the clouds that burst onto the landscape. Beautiful photo. Luci e ombre soffuse ben dosate. Si apprezza anche la rimonta delle nuvole che irrompono sul paesaggio. Foto bellissima. |
| sent on August 23, 2020 (11:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much Andrea Grazie mille Andrea |
| sent on July 07, 2021 (21:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Drugo I really like the shot.
With Peda as it is written, the second shot on 16:9 makes it better that shot you wanted to do.
So good.
Simone Ciao Drugo lo scatto mi piace molto.
Concordo con Peda per quanto scritto, il secondo scatto il 16:9 rende meglio che scatto volevi fare.
Comunque ottima.
Simone |
| sent on July 08, 2021 (9:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Simone, thank you so much for your appreciation and for the advice ! Ciao Simone, grazie mille dell'apprezzamento e del consiglio ! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
