What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 29, 2020 (12:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In my opinion, if I can afford it, for this shot it would have been better a more closed diaphragm - say f. 8 or f. 11 - to take advantage of the pdc and make well readable even the background in the background, which in this photo is still annoyingly readable and does not make the cliff and fence that are in the foreground stand out properly. :-)
Hello, Carlo Secondo me, se posso permettermi, per questo scatto sarebbe stato meglio un diaframma più chiuso - diciamo f. 8 o f. 11 - per sfruttare la pdc e rendere ben leggibile anche lo sfondo in secondo piano, che in questa foto risulta ancora fastidiosamente leggibile e non fa risaltare a dovere la rupe e lo steccato che sono in primo piano. 
Ciao, Carlo |
| sent on July 29, 2020 (12:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Carlo, of course you can afford, we would miss, criticism and advice are more than welcome, actually I exaggerated a little, and the detachment, by force of things is not even as marked as I would have liked, but maybe it was not really the right scene to shoot in those parameters, but I'm here to experiment and especially to learn. Thank you again and a warm greeting. Alexander. Ciao Carlo, certo che puoi permetterti, ci mancherebbe, critiche e consigli sono piu che graditi, effettivamente ho esagerato un po, e lo stacco, per forza di cose non è neanche cosi marcato come avrei voluto io, ma forse non era proprio la scena adatta per scattare in quei parametri, ma sono qui per sperimentare e soprattutto per imparare. Grazie ancora e un caro saluto. Alessandro. |
| sent on July 29, 2020 (15:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Alessandro, thank you for the consideration and for the greetings :-) Anyway.... shooting you learn ;-)
The goal you've used is extraordinary... a real blade in terms of sharpness, contrast and general rendering: at TA can give the best of itself with subjects in the foreground no more than 5-7 meters away, to make them stand out from the background, while with more "broad" views the best of itself returns it with more closed diaphragms, without exceeding f. 16 so as not to risk the general qualitative decay caused by the difraction.
Good light and good photos 8-)
Hello, Carlo Alessandro, grazie per la considerazione e per i saluti Comunque.... scattando si impara 
L'obiettivo che hai utilizzato è straordinario... una vera lama in termini di nitidezza, contrasto e resa generale: a TA può dare il meglio di sé con soggetti in primo piano a non più di 5-7 metri di distanza, per farli risaltare dallo sfondo, mentre con vedute più "ampie" il meglio di sé lo restituisce con diaframmi più chiusi, senza superare f. 16 per non rischiare il decadimento qualitativo generale causato dalla diffrazione.
Buona luce e buone foto 
Ciao, Carlo |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
20.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
