RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Macro and Flora
  4. » objective test

 
objective test...

Uccelli

View gallery (25 photos)

objective test sent on July 27, 2020 (15:04) by Rene' Micio. 3 comments, 134 views. [retina]

, 1/160 f/5.6, ISO 100, hand held.




View High Resolution 9.3 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarmoderator
sent on July 27, 2020 (16:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Proof of what?
Surrender?
Pur have the dragonfly a certain parallel with the sensor plane the maf is uncertain, the pdc impalabile, there are dominants on the body, lacks an overall detail.
Consiglo:
Species in a macro shot if you want to do a test that has solid bases better organize us with tripod, remote command, dedicated head and making multiple shots varying the diaphragm. For safety since it is preferable to disable the stabilizer better to raise the iso.
(imho)
Hello, lauro

avatarjunior
sent on July 27, 2020 (16:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@Elleemme
was a generic test, not to make macros, used freehand I was half a meter above, thanks for the explanations

avatarmoderator
sent on July 27, 2020 (16:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Trust that it is a good optics , at the limit if tomorrow the naturalistic becomes for you priority you can always bet on a 100-400mm or better yet on a 150-600mm ;-)




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me