What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 257000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 23, 2020 (12:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ that at short distances will never be all in focus. [/QUOTAS]
Not so much distance as parallelism and the right diaphragm to have enough PDC to cover the whole subject.
In the condition in which you photographed the butterfly, it would have been impossible to have it in focus with a single shot due to the inclination of the wings, but your perspective should have been different, that is, to position yourself behind and parallel to it, naturally taking at least three photos and then merging them with PS.
A small LED lamp would have been useful to give it a little more brightness, or compensate a little for the exposure to attenuate the shade. „ " che a corte distanze non sarà mai tutto a fuoco."
Non tanto la distanza quanto il parallelismo ed il giusto diaframma per avere una pdc sufficiente a coprire tutto il soggetto.
Nella condizione in cui hai fotografato la farfalla, sarebbe stato impossibile averla a fuoco con un solo scatto per via dell'inclinazione delle ali, però la tua prospettiva avrebbe dovuto essere differente, ossia posizionarti dietro e parallela ad essa, naturalmente effettuando almeno tre foto e poi fonderle con PS.
Sarebbe stato utile almeno una piccola lampada led per darle un po' più di luminosità, oppure compensare un po' l'esposizione per attenuare l'ombra. |
| sent on November 23, 2020 (19:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Surely the PDR is not the luckiest, perhaps even closing the diaphragm and raising sensitivity would have helped. the idea was to take a single shot, it is an objective test, with this lens but to have such magnification you have to get a little too close. Here the butterfly was about 10cm from the front of the lens. Sicuramente il pdr non è dei più fortunati, forse anche chiudere il diaframma e alzare la sensibilità avrebbe aiutato. l'idea era di fare un singolo scatto, si tratta di una prova obiettivo, con quest'ottica però per avere tale ingrandimento devi avvicinarti un po' troppo. Qui la farfalla era a circa 10cm dal frontale dell'obiettivo. |
| sent on November 25, 2025 (22:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In terms of performance the lens seems to behave well, the fine detail is very good, as well as the sharpness of the points in focus and a beautiful blur.
In terms of composition it is useless to say that there would be some things to correct, but I suppose it was not the focus of the test! In termini di resa l'obiettivo sembra comportarsi bene, molto buono il dettaglio fine, cosi come la nitidezza dei punti a fuoco e un bellissimo sfocato.
In termini di composizione è inutile dire che ci sarebbero delle cose da correggere, ma suppongo non fosse il focus della prova! |
| sent on November 26, 2025 (9:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
That's right, thanks anyway for the observation ;-) Esatto, grazie comunque per l' osservazione  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
