RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Florence...

Firenze

View gallery (34 photos)

Florence sent on February 10, 2013 (20:05) by Andrea Guarducci. 74 comments, 9844 views.

, 13 sec f/7.1, ISO 100, tripod. Firenze, Italy.

#OraBlu #Bridges #Monumenti #LungheEsposizioni #Riflessi #Reflection #Viola #Violet #NightPhotos #Notturno



View High Resolution 19.8 MP  



PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarmoderator
sent on February 10, 2013 (20:42)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Andrea le foto di Firenze non vanno nella sezione paesaggio.

Paesaggi naturali; possono essere inclusi anche elementi umani (persone, sentieri, costruzioni) purchè non siano l'elemento principale; se invece edifici, persone, strutture create dall'uomo sono l'elemento fondamentale della foto, va postata in Architettura/Paesaggio Urbano oppure in Reportage di viaggio.

Le sposto in architettura/paesaggio urbano.
Un saluto.
Paolo .. cusufai

Andrea photos of Florence should not be in the landscape.

Natural landscapes; may also include human elements (people, trails, buildings) provided that they are the main element, but if buildings, people, man-made structures are the cornerstone of the photo, should be posted in Architecture / Urban Landscape Reportage or travel.

The move of architecture / urban landscape.
A greeting.
Paul .. cusufai

avatarsenior
sent on February 10, 2013 (20:48)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Ok , grazieEeeek!!!

Ok, graziewow!

avatarsenior
sent on February 13, 2013 (0:19)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Molto bella questa notturna ... la Luna è il valore aggiunto !

Very beautiful this night ... the Moon is the added value!

avatarsenior
sent on February 13, 2013 (8:14)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Peccato che è una macchia bianca ,m a piano piano s'impara ... GrazieMrGreen

Too bad it's a white spot, but slowly learns ... Thanks:-D

avatarsenior
sent on February 13, 2013 (9:59)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Senza doppie o triple esposizioni (che io non amo perché non è più fotografia ma fotoritocco) è quasi impossibile esporre la Luna e il resto del paesaggio in maniera corretta, troppi stop di differenza (con le attuali fotocamere) ... quindi resto dell'idea che la tua sia una buona notturna.

Poi ... se si ama Photoshop tutto si può fare ! e il sito è pieno zeppo di immagini stupende macinate con il celebre software tanto amato da molti fotografi naturalisti sempre attenti al pixel fuori posto ! ;-)

Ciaooo!

No double or triple exposures (which I do not like because it is not photography but editing) is almost impossible to show the Moon and the rest of the landscape in the right way, too many stop difference (with current cameras) ... therefore remain convinced that yours is a good night.

Then ... if you love Photoshop all you can do! and the site is chock full of beautiful images ground with the famous software so loved by many wildlife photographers are always attentive to the pixel out of place! ;-)

Ciaooo!

avatarsenior
sent on February 13, 2013 (10:13)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Ahahahah è vero, io non so neanche come si fanno le doppie esposizioni Sorry . Grazie ciao !

Ahahahaha it's true, I do not even know how to make double exposures :-|. Hello thanks!

avatarsenior
sent on February 14, 2013 (16:23)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


molto bella ... la cosa che non capisco è come mai la luna non sia impastata nonostante 13 sec di esposizione

il bilanciamento del bianco è particolare (dominante magenta, case forse un po' fredde), ma molto piacevole per me

ciao, francesco

very beautiful ... the thing I do not understand is why the moon is not mixed despite 13 sec exposure

white balance is particular (dominant magenta, houses perhaps a little 'cold), but very pleasant for me

hello, francesco

avatarsenior
sent on February 14, 2013 (16:28)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


... La luna è una macchia biancastra infatti non piace neanche a me Eeeek!!!. Si si ,ho anche ricontrollato le impostazioni scritte sono giuste ... Bo non so?

... The moon is a whitish fact not like it either wow. Yes, yes, I also double-checked the settings are written right ... Bo do not know?

avatarsenior
sent on February 14, 2013 (16:31)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


no, invece a me piace, forse non mi sono spiegato ... me la aspettavo mossa con 13 sec e invece non sembra + di tanto

no, instead I like it, maybe I did not explain ... I was expecting the move with 13 seconds and does not seem instead + of both

avatarsenior
sent on February 14, 2013 (16:34)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


E' vero ...


It 's true ...

avatarsenior
sent on February 14, 2013 (16:44)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Andrea la foto mi piace molto ma anche io mi sarei aspettato la luna mossa e forse più piccola: a che focale hai scattato?
Il bilanciamento del bianco con i colori un pò più freddi del solito invece sono azzeccatissimi.Bravo
Nilo

Andrea the photo I like very much but I would have expected the moon move and perhaps younger, to focus you took?
The white balance with the colors a bit colder than usual instead are azzeccatissimi.Bravo
Nile

avatarsenior
sent on February 14, 2013 (17:02)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Grazie MrGreen Ma non sono ancora molto pratico , cosa vuol dire "a che focale"
?

Thanks:-D But I'm still very practical, what does it mean "to" focal
?

avatarsenior
sent on February 14, 2013 (18:36)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Hai scattato con uno zoom da 18 grandangolo a 55 medio tele le proporzioni e la scena inquadrata cambiano; a 18 scena più ampia e minori dimensioni, a 55 scena più ristretta e maggiori dimensioni. Detto proprio alla buona.

've Taken with a wide angle zoom from 18 to 55 medium telephoto proportions and video scene change and a wider area and 18 smaller, 55 scene smaller and larger. Said just to good.

avatarsenior
sent on February 14, 2013 (18:38)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


sulla base della mia conoscenza di firenze e dei possibili pdr è scattata a 55, quindi una focale equivalente di 82mm

based on my knowledge of Florence and possible pdr is taken at 55, then a focal length equivalent to 82mm

avatarsenior
sent on February 14, 2013 (18:41)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Capisco la dimensione della luna, grazie Fracas.

I understand the size of the moon, thanks Fracas.

avatarsenior
sent on February 14, 2013 (18:51)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Si è scattata con un 18 / 55 si ... Ma cos' ha la luna di strano ?Eeeek!!!

It was taken with a 18/55 is ... But cos' the moon has strange? Wow!

avatarsenior
sent on February 14, 2013 (19:04)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Se fotografi la luna con un grandangolo (18 o meno) la luna viene molto piccola, qui invece ha delle dimensioni che la mettono in evidenza e non sparisce nella foto perchè troppo piccola.

If the moon photographers with a wide-angle (18 or less) the moon is very small, but here is the size of the highlight disappears and not in the picture because they are too small.

avatarsenior
sent on February 14, 2013 (19:14)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Ahh ... Si giusto :-P GrazieMrGreen

Ahh ... Is right:-P Thanks:-D

avatarsenior
sent on February 17, 2013 (9:33)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


bella ripresa
anche a me piacciono i colori un po' "freddini" in questa scena
ciao


nice shot
also I like the colors a bit '"chilly" in this scene
hello

avatarsenior
sent on February 17, 2013 (10:09)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Grazie , ciao !MrGreen

Thank you, hello! :-D


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me