What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 10, 2013 (20:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Andrea photos of Florence should not be in the landscape.
Natural landscapes; may also include human elements (people, trails, buildings) provided that they are the main element, but if buildings, people, man-made structures are the cornerstone of the photo, should be posted in Architecture / Urban Landscape Reportage or travel.
The move of architecture / urban landscape. A greeting. Paul .. cusufai Andrea le foto di Firenze non vanno nella sezione paesaggio. Paesaggi naturali; possono essere inclusi anche elementi umani (persone, sentieri, costruzioni) purchè non siano l'elemento principale; se invece edifici, persone, strutture create dall'uomo sono l'elemento fondamentale della foto, va postata in Architettura/Paesaggio Urbano oppure in Reportage di viaggio. Le sposto in architettura/paesaggio urbano. Un saluto. Paolo .. cusufai |
| sent on February 10, 2013 (20:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok, graziewow! Ok , grazie |
| sent on February 13, 2013 (0:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful this night ... the Moon is the added value! Molto bella questa notturna ... la Luna è il valore aggiunto ! |
| sent on February 13, 2013 (8:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Too bad it's a white spot, but slowly learns ... Thanks:-D Peccato che è una macchia bianca ,m a piano piano s'impara ... Grazie |
| sent on February 13, 2013 (9:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No double or triple exposures (which I do not like because it is not photography but editing) is almost impossible to show the Moon and the rest of the landscape in the right way, too many stop difference (with current cameras) ... therefore remain convinced that yours is a good night.
Then ... if you love Photoshop all you can do! and the site is chock full of beautiful images ground with the famous software so loved by many wildlife photographers are always attentive to the pixel out of place! ;-)
Ciaooo! Senza doppie o triple esposizioni (che io non amo perché non è più fotografia ma fotoritocco) è quasi impossibile esporre la Luna e il resto del paesaggio in maniera corretta, troppi stop di differenza (con le attuali fotocamere) ... quindi resto dell'idea che la tua sia una buona notturna. Poi ... se si ama Photoshop tutto si può fare ! e il sito è pieno zeppo di immagini stupende macinate con il celebre software tanto amato da molti fotografi naturalisti sempre attenti al pixel fuori posto ! Ciaooo! |
| sent on February 13, 2013 (10:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ahahahaha it's true, I do not even know how to make double exposures :-|. Hello thanks! Ahahahah è vero, io non so neanche come si fanno le doppie esposizioni . Grazie ciao ! |
| sent on February 14, 2013 (16:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very beautiful ... the thing I do not understand is why the moon is not mixed despite 13 sec exposure
white balance is particular (dominant magenta, houses perhaps a little 'cold), but very pleasant for me
hello, francesco molto bella ... la cosa che non capisco è come mai la luna non sia impastata nonostante 13 sec di esposizione il bilanciamento del bianco è particolare (dominante magenta, case forse un po' fredde), ma molto piacevole per me ciao, francesco |
| sent on February 14, 2013 (16:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
... The moon is a whitish fact not like it either wow. Yes, yes, I also double-checked the settings are written right ... Bo do not know? ... La luna è una macchia biancastra infatti non piace neanche a me . Si si ,ho anche ricontrollato le impostazioni scritte sono giuste ... Bo non so? |
| sent on February 14, 2013 (16:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
no, instead I like it, maybe I did not explain ... I was expecting the move with 13 seconds and does not seem instead + of both no, invece a me piace, forse non mi sono spiegato ... me la aspettavo mossa con 13 sec e invece non sembra + di tanto |
| sent on February 14, 2013 (16:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It 's true ... E' vero ... |
| sent on February 14, 2013 (16:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Andrea the photo I like very much but I would have expected the moon move and perhaps younger, to focus you took? The white balance with the colors a bit colder than usual instead are azzeccatissimi.Bravo Nile Andrea la foto mi piace molto ma anche io mi sarei aspettato la luna mossa e forse più piccola: a che focale hai scattato? Il bilanciamento del bianco con i colori un pò più freddi del solito invece sono azzeccatissimi.Bravo Nilo |
| sent on February 14, 2013 (17:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks:-D But I'm still very practical, what does it mean "to" focal ? Grazie Ma non sono ancora molto pratico , cosa vuol dire "a che focale" ? |
| sent on February 14, 2013 (18:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
've Taken with a wide angle zoom from 18 to 55 medium telephoto proportions and video scene change and a wider area and 18 smaller, 55 scene smaller and larger. Said just to good. Hai scattato con uno zoom da 18 grandangolo a 55 medio tele le proporzioni e la scena inquadrata cambiano; a 18 scena più ampia e minori dimensioni, a 55 scena più ristretta e maggiori dimensioni. Detto proprio alla buona. |
| sent on February 14, 2013 (18:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
based on my knowledge of Florence and possible pdr is taken at 55, then a focal length equivalent to 82mm sulla base della mia conoscenza di firenze e dei possibili pdr è scattata a 55, quindi una focale equivalente di 82mm |
| sent on February 14, 2013 (18:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I understand the size of the moon, thanks Fracas. Capisco la dimensione della luna, grazie Fracas. |
| sent on February 14, 2013 (18:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It was taken with a 18/55 is ... But cos' the moon has strange? Wow! Si è scattata con un 18 / 55 si ... Ma cos' ha la luna di strano ? |
| sent on February 14, 2013 (19:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If the moon photographers with a wide-angle (18 or less) the moon is very small, but here is the size of the highlight disappears and not in the picture because they are too small. Se fotografi la luna con un grandangolo (18 o meno) la luna viene molto piccola, qui invece ha delle dimensioni che la mettono in evidenza e non sparisce nella foto perchè troppo piccola. |
| sent on February 14, 2013 (19:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ahh ... Is right:-P Thanks:-D Ahh ... Si giusto Grazie |
| sent on February 17, 2013 (9:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice shot also I like the colors a bit '"chilly" in this scene hello bella ripresa anche a me piacciono i colori un po' "freddini" in questa scena ciao |
| sent on February 17, 2013 (10:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you, hello! :-D Grazie , ciao ! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |