JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on June 17, 2020 (18:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The composition is decentralized on the non-functional side, an uncertain maf, little pdc, overexposure and disturbance on the butterfly are palpable. Consys: -never to get to the first shots of instinct -close the diaphragm -evaluate a dedicated macro You can ! (imho) Hello, Lauro La composizione risulta decentrata sul lato poco funzionale, sono palpabili una maf incerta, poca pdc, sovraesposizione e disturbo sulla farfalla. Consigli: -mai femarsi alle prime inquadrature d'istinto -chiudere il diaframma -valutare un'ottica dedicata macro You can ! (imho) Ciao, Lauro
sent on June 18, 2020 (11:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Lauro, I am aware of the flaws and thank you for the advice. I was walking on the embankment with my wife and I had the Sony in my hand so every now and then I would go ahead and shoot. Quite the opposite of what would be needed: studying the framing, choosing the diaphragm, etc. Who was fun! I would not buy a dedicated optics (macro) because I do not want to venture into a challenging genre that then I will not have time to cultivate. I "taste" the real macros of those who are capable... May I could take a manual fix around 50-60 millimeters, suitable for portraits and some close-ups with tubes. I don't know, I have to experiment... Grazie Lauro, sono consapevole dei difetti e ti ringrazio per i consigli. Ero a camminare sull'argine con mia moglie e avevo la Sony in mano così ogni tanto andavo avanti e scattavo. Tutto il contrario di quello che sarebbe servito: studiare l'inquadratura, scegliere il diaframma, ecc. Però è stato divertente! Non vorrei acquistare un'ottica dedicata (macro) perché non voglio avventurarmi in un genere impegnativo che poi non avrò il tempo di coltivare. Mi "gusto" le macro vere di chi è capace... Magari potrei prendere un fisso manuale intorno ai 50-60 millimetri, adatto ai ritratti e a qualche close-up con tubi. Non so, devo sperimentare...
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
7.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
