JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on February 09, 2013 (20:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but the trees were illuminated by some light in the area? try looking for a completely dark area and raise the iso I have a 3200 550D and the noise is acceptable you have to do many tests over time will improve ;-) and then uses some of the pictures you will see pp. completely change appearance! hello ma gli alberi erano illuminati da qualche luce in zona?? prova a cercare una zona completamente buia e alzare gli iso io ho una 550D e a 3200 il rumore è accettabile devi fare tante prove con il tempo si migliora e poi usa un po di pp vedrai che le foto cambiano completamente aspetto!! ciao
sent on February 10, 2013 (13:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello Den88 is a little behind me in the distance there was a beacon that pointed in the right direction: fconfuso: But do not think it ruined the picture, I tried to include a small church next to this field but since the first time I came home and saw that I did well exposed for the foreground and almost all the pictures I've done the due Trashing :-( that bitterness! Anyway I'll go out again to take these pictures xkè is just beautiful pictures of the sky and stand in silence in the middle of nowhere nn is priceless :-)
because of the passage! ciao Den88 , si alle mie spalle un poco in lontananza c'era un faro che puntava giusto in quella direzione però non penso abbia rovinato l'immagine , ho provato a includere anche una piccola chiesetta a fianco a questo campo ma essendo la prima volta sono tornato a casa e ho visto che nn avevo esposto bene per il primo piano e praticamente tutte le foto che ho fatto le ho dovute cestinare che amarezza! Cmq uscirò ancora a fare queste foto xkè è proprio bello fotografare il cielo e stare in silenzio in mezzo al nulla nn ha prezzo
sent on July 15, 2013 (20:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like! I'm not an expert on night because I have not yet fatte.ma I read some articles and with an optical drive such as yours could lengthen the exposure time of 30 sec without the blur of the stars. A me piace! Non sono esperto di notturna perché non l'ho ancora fatte.ma ho letto un po di articoli e con una ottica come la tua cosi spinta potevi allungare l'esposizione di 30 sec senza avere il mosso delle stelle.
sent on July 16, 2013 (12:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
sfeso hello! I have not stretched beyond the 15 second exposure because otherwise I would greatly overexposed the image ... and then sincerely do not need to go up to 30 seconds ... indeed it is always better when you can shorten the time ;-)
thanks for the ride and good light 8-) 8-) 8-) ciao sfeso! non ho allungato oltre i 15 secondi l'esposizione perchè sennò avrei sovraesposto di molto l'immagine... e poi sinceramente non è necessario arrivare a 30 secondi... anzi quando si riesce è sempre meglio abbreviare il tempo