What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 10, 2020 (12:16) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
| sent on June 10, 2020 (12:31) | This comment has been translated
Excellent shot, congratulations! |
| sent on June 10, 2020 (13:02)
Great details!
Compliments,
Hello, Renaud |
| sent on June 10, 2020 (16:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful, I guess I'm going to go through this sooner or later. Here at the Peat Bogs with a 300 for more MF I can do very little, if with a 250 eq. comes out this stuff is just worth it Bellissima, mi sa che prima o poi ci passo anch'io di lì. Qui alle Torbiere con un 300 per di più MF riesco a fare ben poco, se con un 250 eq. viene fuori questa roba vale proprio la pena |
| sent on June 10, 2020 (16:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Stefanocro69 of the passage and the welcome comment, I must point out that, by mistake, I selected the Sigma 180 but, in fact, I used the Canon 100-400 plus 1.4X as indicated in the caption. Unfortunately on this site it is not possible to make changes of this type except by deleting and resting the photo, with the consequence of losing all comments.
I preferred not to do it out of respect for all of you who have left a comment.
A
GA greeting Grazie Stefanocro69 del passaggio e del gradito commento, devo precisare che, per errore, ho selezionato il Sigma 180 ma, in realtà, ho usato il Canon 100-400 + 1.4X come indicato nella didascalia. Purtroppo su questo sito non è possibile apportare modifiche di questo tipo se non cancellando e riposando la foto, con la conseguenza di perdere tutti i commenti.
Ho preferito non farlo per rispetto di tutti Voi che avete lasciato un commento.
Un saluto
GA |
| sent on June 10, 2020 (17:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So it's a 560 :-D?
How much they seem more within reach, maybe they're used differently to contact with men. Quindi e' un 560  ?
Comunque mi sembrano più a portata, magari sono abituati diversamente al contatto con gli uomini. |
| sent on June 10, 2020 (18:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes Stefano, we talk about 560mm, obviously a certain crop helps but, the trump card, it is the boat on purpose near the gauze and camouflaged, in this way they fly quietly at about twenty meters, sometimes even less! Si Stefano, parliamo di 560mm, ovviamente un certo crop aiuta ma, la carta vincente, è la barca apposta vicino alla garzaia e mimetizzata, in questo modo volano tranquilli ad una ventina di metri, a volte anche meno! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
8.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
