RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
acha...

VARIE

View gallery (18 photos)

acha sent on February 08, 2013 (16:28) by Francesco Saccà. 5 comments, 390 views.

at 33mm, 1/50 f/5.6, ISO 200,




View High Resolution 10.8 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarmoderator
sent on February 08, 2013 (16:33)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Non comprendo i motivi di questo servizio anche se noto una stecca millimetrata Eeeek!!! ma sono sicuro che se ti impegnavi avresti evitato che lo sfondo sparasse optando per un punto di ripresa non aereo ma laterale, che le casette così sfocate disturbassero così se chiudevi il diaframma e che avresti potuto scegliere un posatoio più naturale. (imho)
ciao, lauro

I do not understand the reasons for this service if you notice a stick graph wow! but I'm sure if you would have avoided the background impegnavi shoot opting for a point of recovery but not air side, the little houses so blurred disturbing so if you locked the aperture and you could choose a more natural perch. (Imho)
hello, laurel

avatarsenior
sent on February 08, 2013 (17:37)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Forse dovevi puntare il flash in modo che arrivava riflesso e non diretto, come dice Lauro è Sparata!

Maybe you should point the flash so that it arrived reflection and not direct, says Lauro is shot!

avatarjunior
sent on February 11, 2013 (11:35)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


avete ragione... ma queste sono foto a carattere semi.scientifico... non tengo molto alla bellezza... (guardate le altre foto che ho fatto per la bellezza) ;)

you're right ... but these are photos semi.scientifico character ... I do not keep much to the beauty ... (Look at the other photos I took for the beauty) ;)

avatarmoderator
sent on February 11, 2013 (21:35)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Prova a immaginare se tu le avessi riprese di lato perfettamente allungate e parallele al piano sensore , con la stecca leggermente inclinata dietro di loro. Il dettaglio e la pdc ti avrebbero permesso di avere meno sfocato che impallava. Anche se era per scopi quasi-semi-scientifici avresti dato un colpo al cerchio ed uno alla botte.;-) (imho)
ciao, lauro

Just imagine if you had taken the side of perfectly elongated and parallel to the floor sensor, with the stick tilted slightly behind them. The detail and the pdc would allow you to have less blurring that impallava. Even if it was for a quasi-semi-scientific'd give a shot at the rim and a barrel. ;-) (Imho)
hello, laurel

avatarjunior
sent on February 13, 2013 (16:17)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


ehehehe anche tu hai ragione :)

ehehehe also you're right :)


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me