Royal swan | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Birds

21.4 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Ancora Alviano.... View gallery (36 photos)

Royal swan sent on June 05, 2020 (20:34) by Marcola62. 5 comments, 161 views.

at 371mm, 1/640 f/7.1, ISO 200, hand held.

View High Resolution 21.4 MP

2 persons like it: Peppe Cancellieri, Rial

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Elleemme

sent on June 05, 2020 (20:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Good detail and colors. Always check if the subject hangs and here is very conspicuous the inclination to the right. If we have any doubts we use the grid in the photo editing program and verify that the scecular area is matched.
(imho)
Hello, Lauro

Marcola62

sent on June 05, 2020 (21:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I had actually taken as a reference the drop of water falling into the water from my mouth. but reviewing the original image actually there's a slight slope. thank you for the comment. hello Marco

Elleemme

sent on June 05, 2020 (22:11)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Per pendenza non degna di nota di solito siamo entro 0,25° di inclinazione
Per leggera entro 0,5°-massimo 1°
Qui oggettivamente siamo a 4° gradi ed è consistente

Siamo però facilitati a notare le inclinazioni perchè il soggetto galleggia in uno specchio d'acqua...
Dove ci sono microonde il riflesso sarà più spezzato e quindi meno attendibile
L'importante è avere minimo 2 zone nodali per un riscontro rapido
Qui l'andamento del collo e la parte terminale della coda
La zona del becco riflessa, per i motivi accennati sopra è da prendere con le molle.

Se ricontrolli alcuni tuoi ultimi scatti il problema si ripresenta.

Se vogliamo curare dal pre-scatto la compo affidiamoci a mirini con griglia incorporata come la canon 7dm2 ;-)

(imho)
Ciao, Lauro

Marcola62

sent on June 05, 2020 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I usually make a case especially in pp..... now I'm going to pay more attention. thank you for the suggestion

Marcola62

sent on June 05, 2020 (22:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

“ If you double-check some of your last shots the problem reoccurs „

si also in the one with two swans there was a slope of about 2.5 degrees.... settled

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.