What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 04, 2020 (10:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful and complete, I love it! Did you use the 24-70 f/4s for all four? Do you still have 20/2.8D? Hello Charles Bella e completa, mi piace! Hai usato il 24-70 f/4s per tutte e quattro? Hai ancora il 20/2.8D? Ciao Carlo |
| sent on June 04, 2020 (22:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Carlo, thank you for the ride! :-) No, I used for all the 70-200 f4 ..... and very often I also felt short! I'm looking forward to the 200-600 Z-series! Si, I still have 20mm, and it gnaws enough not to be able to use it in AF! (even here I hope that sooner or later an FTZ will come out that will keep the AF with D-series lenses!) Ciao Carlo, grazie del passaggio! No, ho usato per tutte il 70-200 f4 .....e molto spesso mi sentivo anche corto! Sto aspettando con impazienza il 200-600 serie Z! Si, ho ancora il 20mm, e mi rode abbastanza non poterlo usare in AF! (anche qui spero che uscirà prima o poi un FTZ che mantenga l'AF con le lenti serie D!) |
| sent on June 05, 2020 (0:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I asked you why I was thinking of selling my AFS 20 f/1.8G, hea Te l'ho chiesto perché stavo pensando di vendere il mio AFS 20 f/1.8G, ciao |
| sent on June 05, 2020 (0:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I actually took a Nikon 20-UD f/3.5 beautiful from collectors (the first 20mm of Nikon house) and the Zeiss Distagon 21 f/2.8 and maybe something I should give away, what would you do? In realtà ho preso un Nikon 20-UD f/3.5 bellissimo da collezionisti (il primo 20mm di casa Nikon) e lo Zeiss Distagon 21 f/2.8 e forse qualcosa dovrei dare via, tu che faresti? |
| sent on June 05, 2020 (14:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I must admit I didn't know the Nikon 20mm UD (holy Ken Rockwell! :-D ) The best optically I think is the Zeiss (of course!) ..... However, many other factors weigh on the choice: The Nikon UD, from the images on the net, looks really good, but I would consider it more of a collector's item. Between the Zeiss is the Nikon G depends, in my opinion, on how you shoot. For example, I often use short focals for shots on the fly.... so I'm comfortable with the AF. even on ultrawide where you often go hyperfocal. Sys the photos with 20mm you do them in a more "reasoned" way in my opinion there is no story (Zeiss!). ................ I hope I didn't add any more confusion!! :-/ :-) Devo ammettere che non conoscevo il Nikon 20mm UD (santo Ken Rockwell! ) Il migliore otticamente credo sia lo Zeiss (ovviamente!) .....però sulla scelta pesano comunque molti altri fattori: Il Nikon UD, dalle immagini su rete, sembra veramente buono, ma io lo considererei più che altro un pezzo da collezione. Tra lo Zeiss è il Nikon G dipende, secondo me, da come scatti. Io ad esempio, uso spesso focali corte per scatti al volo....quindi a me l'AF fa comodo....anche su ultrawide dove spesso si va di iperfocale. Se invece le foto con il 20mm le fai in maniera più “ragionata” secondo me non c'è storia (Zeiss!). .................... Spero di non aver aggiunto ulteriore confusione!!  |
| sent on June 05, 2020 (16:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not at all and thank you. I'm telling you mine with direct comparisons. The Nikon in addition to an abundant stop in addition, has less vignette, is autofocus and on paper is sharper although little visible the difference in the field (Photozone). The Zeiss has more vignette and you see but already at F/4 decreases. Compared to the Nikon, the Zeiss opens the shadows more and has more beautiful and live colors already from f/4 while the Nikon keeps constant. So I was thinking about selling the 20 and taking the 24 f/1.8 AFs. Zeiss is too beautiful physically and addictive. I can't resell it No affatto e ti ringrazio. Ti dico la mia con confronti diretti. Il Nikon oltre ad uno stop abbondante in più, ha meno vignettatura, è autofocus e sulla carta è più nitido anche se poco visibile la differenza sul campo (Photozone). Lo Zeiss ha maggior vignettatura e si vede ma già a F/4 diminuisce. Rispetto al Nikon, lo Zeiss apre più le ombre e ha colori più belli e vivi già da f/4 mentre il Nikon si mantiene costante. Così stavo pensando di vendere il 20 e prendere il 24 f/1.8 AFs. Lo Zeiss è troppo bello fisicamente e crea dipendenza. Non posso rivenderlo |
| sent on June 06, 2020 (3:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Zeiss is too beautiful physically and addictive. I can't resell it „ Regionable! ;-) " Lo Zeiss è troppo bello fisicamente e crea dipendenza. Non posso rivenderlo" Ragionevole! |
| sent on June 18, 2020 (9:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Maximilian, I managed to exchange with a guy from Rome, ;-) Once-in-a-lifetime occasion: my 20 for its 24th a little match in my favor. Carlo Ciao Massimiliano, sono riuscito nello scambio con un tizio di Roma, occasione irripetibile: il mio 20 per il suo 24 + un piccolo conguaglio a mio favore. Carlo |
| sent on June 23, 2020 (0:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great! ;-) Ottimo! |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |