What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 08, 2013 (21:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful light, beautiful bn.
Bella luce, bel bn.
|
| sent on February 09, 2013 (9:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Roberto. Thanks for the ride. What I'm sorry the photo is the low yield of d60 in terms of definitions (with the current 5d mark II would have been a different story). However, it is the most beautiful creation of Canova, and I think this photo captures it the best sense Ciao Roberto. Grazie del passaggio. Quello che mi dispiace della foto è la bassa resa della d60 in termini di definizioni (con l'attuale 5d mark II sarebbe stata tutta un'altra storia). Tuttavia si tratta della più bella realizzazione del Canova, e penso che questa foto ne colga al meglio il senso |
| sent on February 11, 2013 (15:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Canova not be discussed. Roberto even, especially for this image that makes everything a whole Cupid and Psyche should perhaps make. I'm not sure, however, that the Canon 60D (unless you own Nikon d60, I do not know at all) is so terrible in definition, it will be something else happened?! You used to much?! Since I also take an interest in, I'd like to know your opinion a. Thank you and hello. ;-) Canova non si discute. Roberto neppure, soprattutto per quest'immagine che nell'insieme rende tutto quello che Amore e Psiche deve forse rendere. Non sono sicuro però che la Canon 60D (a meno che sia proprio Nikon d60, che non conosco per nulla) sia così terribile in definizione, sarà successo qualcos'altro??!! L'hai usata per molto??!! Siccome avrei anche interesse a prenderla, mi piacerebbe sapere un Tuo parere. Grazie e ciao.  |
| sent on February 12, 2013 (19:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
CIA John actually was the Nikon D60 and the Canon that I have ever owned, with the 18-55 base. At high iso (indoors) did not have a very high resolution but too much can not be expected from an entry level. ;-) Cia Giovanni In realtà era la Nikon D60 e non la Canon che non ho mai posseduto, con il 18-55 base. Ad alti iso (in interni) non aveva una risoluzione altissima ma più di tanto non si può pretendere da una entry level. |
| sent on February 12, 2013 (20:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok perfect, hello to you ;-) Ok perfetto, ciao a Te |
| sent on February 13, 2013 (23:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Grazie a te |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
