JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user101
sent on September 13, 2011 (17:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the resume point is very high, but surely you could not get in the water. otherwise it is set so that confuses me: I almost had to look for the bird! moreover the water is too much you have left at the top and also the reflections are undesirable for photos. il punto di ripresa è molto alto, ma sicuramente non potevi scendere in acqua. per il resto è talmente ambientata che mi confonde: quasi ho dovuto cercare il pennuto!!! oltretutto è troppa la parte d'acqua che hai lasciato in alto ed anche i riflessi non giovano alla foto.
sent on September 13, 2011 (18:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with what was said by the spirochete, maybe a little croppando recoveries Concordo con quanto detto da spirocheta, magari croppando recuperi un pò
sent on September 13, 2011 (21:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, is not a minor but a squid Yellow-legged Sandpiper stained ( Actitis macularius ). Hello Ciao, non è un Totano zampegialle minore ma un Piro piro macchiato ( Actitis macularius ). Ciao
sent on September 14, 2011 (9:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello everyone and thanks for the comments I will try not to repeat the mistakes! @ Porcupine was in doubt between the Lesser Yellowlegs and Spotted Sandpiper ... But the Sandpiper should have the beak more 'clear and feet brownish clear ... While the squid has yellow legs and beak darker ... For this I thought it was a squid. In fact, looking at the shape of the beak ... seems more 'a sandpiper. Thank you! Ciao a tutti e grazie per i commenti cercherò di non ripetere gli errori! @Istrice ero in dubbio tra il Lesser Yellowlegs e Spotted Sandpiper... però il Piro piro dovrebbe avere il becco piu' chiaro e le zampe marroncine chiare... Mentre il Totano ha le zampe gialle e il becco più scuro... Per questo pensavo fosse un totano. In effetti guardando la forma del becco... sembra piu' un piro piro. Grazie!
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
