RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Paesaggio con elementi umani
  4. » Sunset at the Bridge of Three Arches

 
Sunset at the Bridge of Three Arches...

Veneto e Dintorni

View gallery (4 photos)

Sunset at the Bridge of Three Arches sent on April 26, 2020 (18:28) by Semalb. 7 comments, 94 views. [retina]

, 10 sec f/22.0, ISO 100, tripod. Venezia, Italy.

Modificati leggermente i valori delle ombre per evidenziare le facciate delle case, e ridotto leggermente il rumore di fondo con Lightroom. Peccato per il terribile rumore di fondo ad alta risoluzione.



View High Resolution 17.9 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 196000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on April 26, 2020 (20:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello, the photo is not bad and I do not see the noise so terrible.
Personally I would have increased the exposure a little more on the facades of the buildings to make them more readable.
Ma also can be a choice.
I have some misgivings about the shooting time, because to have a trail of light of the most predominant boat needed a much longer time and therefore an ND filter.
I probably didn't have the filter, but then I would have kept the shorter times, so you could keep the diaphragm more open, at f22 you risk a drop in quality due to dif-in.

avatarjunior
sent on April 26, 2020 (21:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello, thank you for the comment!
Ow the light trail of the boat was not wanted, I had not noticed the departing ferry because it did not have the lights on when I started shooting. I pore a little bit when I noticed it, but it was too late, unfortunately.
So you'd recommend a f8 or f10 with less exposure time? The only reason I kept the diaphragm so closed was to have the star effect on the lights. Nothing more.
I try again next time with your advice, and maybe I'm careful that there are no ferries between your feet.

avatarsenior
sent on April 26, 2020 (21:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ah, you kept the diaphragm so closed for the star effect, yes, if you search for that's right, the problem is that the yongnuo I don't think it does who knows what stars.
For star-shaped light, the lens must also be so good (number of slats, shape of slats).
According to me this photo could be developed in two ways, or with extremely long times so that you have the trail of the ferry that crosses the whole image.
Even with shorter times not to have precisely the trails that can disturb the atmosphere of the Lagoon.
Around f8 I think your goal gives the best, so if there are no needs to use another diaphragm I would use that.
Mat don't make it a disease, if you need more depth of field or not close or open the diaphragm without getting too much trouble.

avatarjunior
sent on April 26, 2020 (21:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you, actually now that I've switched to FF I've seen that it has several limits as a goal. Even for artistic nude photographs and nude details I thought to switch to the Canon 50mm F1.4 that should give me more satisfaction even of depth of field, as well as being of higher quality. What do you say? I'm a bit fixated on 50mm, I use it pretty much all the time.
I still took a picture of the sun among the spires of the Palazzo Ducale that brought out a great stellona, but maybe it's because we talk about the sun. As soon as I fix my Lightroom gallery I pick it up outside.

avatarsenior
sent on April 26, 2020 (21:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Probably, but I'm not a starry expert :-D
Sily the 50ino Canon is more appropriate.
On the focal is a fairly personal discourse, it depends a lot on how you shoot, if you feel good it continues to use it as a focal point.
At the time, the old SLRs were sold in 50mm kits.

avatarjunior
sent on April 26, 2020 (21:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

AHAHAHAHAH thank you were very kind :-D
I'm sure I get 50 in the first place. Thanks for :) advice

avatarsenior
sent on April 26, 2020 (21:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

;-) good photos.



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me