Yellow, New10 | JuzaPhoto

Join JuzaPhoto!

A A ? HELP SEARCH

Galleries
Macro and Flora

Resize to fit window

16.0 MEGAPIXEL

tommaso paolucci View gallery (60 photos)

Yellow, New10 sent on 18 Aprile 2020 (21:39) by Tommaso Paolucci. 9 comments, 179 views.

1/2000 f/5.6, ISO 640,

View High Resolution 16.0 MP

1 person like it: Anelanna1970

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 258000members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Elleemme

sent on 28 Aprile 2020 (13:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Good colors.
A compositional level is unbalanced because there is little space where the subject's head is turned.
To correct/clone the burnt areas of the flower/perch
The maf is inaccurate and the pdc too narrow.
If the shot was done freehand it was preferable:
a-use only one af and af-continuous point because in the start to shoot we always tend to swing with the torso and then to vary the distance between sensor and point of maf
b-choose a more closed diaphragm to extend the pdc just enough (1/2000sec are a lot)
c-the head is the very important area MUST be included in the pdc without ifs and but then the mix between a) and b) could solve the problem
(imho)
Hello, Lauro, New

Tommaso Paolucci

sent on 04 Maggio 2020 (16:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Lauro and thank you for the message and advice, it was a windy day and about 200 photos I pulled out only about ten, nikon d7200 with nikon 55 f/2.8 macro all in manual - tube extension 1:1, very difficult to use so let's let's go with the wind

Elleemme

sent on 04 Maggio 2020 (16:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Evaluate this expense hypothesis:
-monetization 55mm
-search 105mm sigma os used or tamron 90mm vc used
-kenko 1.4x dgx used
e imposed stabilizer, one af point, af continuous and wait for the wind dead spot ;-)

Tommaso Paolucci

sent on 04 Maggio 2020 (16:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

yes I thought about it but it's great as a goal, it has an absurd color range and without extension I like to take several photos, go see the other photos uploaded

Elleemme

sent on 04 Maggio 2020 (20:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

ok but as you know if the maf is uncertain, if the diaphragm is open and there are compositional limits due to the insertion of an extension tube. on the other hand you have a system that if one needs, keeps the Af and exceeds the 1:1 playback rapp with more compositional possibilities ;-) (imho)

Tommaso Paolucci

sent on 04 Maggio 2020 (20:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Didn't I understand sincerely, in simple terms?

Tommaso Paolucci

sent on 04 Maggio 2020 (20:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ah, I understand now?

Elleemme

sent on 04 Maggio 2020 (22:31)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

a) il kenko dgx 1.4x ha la caratterischica che non fa perdere l'autofocus ad ottiche macro da 90mm in su Cool

b) la sua presenza comporta 3 vantaggi:
-non ci sono perdite di resa degne di nota
-a parità di ingrandimento si riprende da più distanti e senza disturbare l'insetto od ombreggiarlo
-a parità di distanza si ha un soggetto che occupa una maggior porzione nella scena
c) se non si bloccano non i clamp i gambi dei fiori (delicatamente), il gambo e quindi il fiore potrebbe farsi cullare dal vento
d) il fotografo non si vede mentre sta riprendendo a mano libera (immaginarsi se in manual focus) .
Invece l'osservatore esterno , di lato, vedrebbe chiaramente che il fotografo, essendo un bipede, tenderebbe sempre a rimanere in perenne equlibrio .... quindi? il busto tenderebbe sempre ad ondeggiare Confuso

Se si scatta a mano libera il fotografo ondeggiando sposta il punto di messa a fuoco appena ottenuto e lapdc di conseguenza.
Il fiore in balia di una leggera brezza tende ad ondeggiare ... altro potenziale spostamento della distanza tra sensore e soggetto posato su un fiore
Ci sono troppi spostamenti e sta al fotografo sentirli-ascoltarli-vederli, sta alla nostra capacità di addomesticare il fiore e ottimizzare la nostra tendenza a basculare con il corpo.
e) 1/2000sec? ma allora perchè f.5,6 se il soggetto è vicinissimo? C'erano i margini per chiudere il diaframma e aumentare la profondità di campo ? SI

Riflessione finale: se si volesse anche superare il rapp.to 1:1
-perchè non optare a mano libera su un 90 o 105mm che può trasformarsi in un 135mm o un 157.5mm a f.4 t.a.?
-perchè non sfruttare l'autofocus con 1 solo punto di af e e af-continuo (sempre a mano libera) ?
Cool

ciao, lauro

Tommaso Paolucci

sent on 05 Maggio 2020 (7:07) | This comment has been translated

;-)

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.