What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 28, 2020 (13:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good colors.
A compositional level is unbalanced because there is little space where the subject's head is turned.
To correct/clone the burnt areas of the flower/perch
The maf is inaccurate and the pdc too narrow.
If the shot was done freehand it was preferable:
a-use only one af and af-continuous point because in the start to shoot we always tend to swing with the torso and then to vary the distance between sensor and point of maf
b-choose a more closed diaphragm to extend the pdc just enough (1/2000sec are a lot)
c-the head is the very important area MUST be included in the pdc without ifs and but then the mix between a) and b) could solve the problem
(imho)
Hello, Lauro, New Buoni i colori.
A livello compositivo risulta sbilanciata perchè c'è poco spazio dove la testa del soggetto è rivolta.
Da correggere/clonare le zone bruciate del fiore/posatoio
La maf risulta imprecisa e la pdc troppo ristretta.
Se lo scatto è stato eseguito a mano libera era preferibile:
a-usare un solo punto af e af-continuo perchè nell'accingerci a scattare tendiamo sempre a dondolare con il busto e quindi a variare la distanza tra sensore e punto di maf
b-scegliere un diaframma più chiuso per estendere la pdc quanto bastava (1/2000sec sono tantissimi)
c-la testa è la zona importantissima DEVE essere inclusa nella pdc senza se e senza ma quindi il mix tra a) e b) potevano risolvere il problema
(imho)
ottica-focale usate?
Ciao, Lauro |
| sent on May 04, 2020 (16:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Lauro and thank you for the message and advice, it was a windy day and about 200 photos I pulled out only about ten, nikon d7200 with nikon 55 f/2.8 macro all in manual - tube extension 1:1, very difficult to use so let's let's go with the wind Ciao Lauro e grazie del messaggio e dei consigli, era una giornata ventosa e di circa 200 foto ne ho tirate fuori solo una decina, nikon d7200 con nikon 55 f/2.8 macro tutto in manuale+tubo prolunga 1:1, molto difficile da usare percio' figuriamoci con il vento |
| sent on May 04, 2020 (16:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Evaluate this expense hypothesis:
-monetization 55mm
-search 105mm sigma os used or tamron 90mm vc used
-kenko 1.4x dgx used
e imposed stabilizer, one af point, af continuous and wait for the wind dead spot ;-) Valuta questa ipotesi di spesa:
-monetizzazione 55mm
-ricerca 105mm sigma os usato o tamron 90mm vc usato
-kenko 1.4x dgx usato
e imposti stabilizzatore, un solo punto af, af continuo e attendi il punto morto del vento  |
| sent on May 04, 2020 (16:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
yes I thought about it but it's great as a goal, it has an absurd color range and without extension I like to take several photos, go see the other photos uploaded si ci ho pensato ma e' fantastico come obiettivo, ha una gamma cromatica assurda e senza prolunga mi piace per fare diverse foto, vai a vedere le altre foto caricate |
| sent on May 04, 2020 (20:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ok but as you know if the maf is uncertain, if the diaphragm is open and there are compositional limits due to the insertion of an extension tube. on the other hand you have a system that if one needs, keeps the Af and exceeds the 1:1 playback rapp with more compositional possibilities ;-) (imho) ok ma come noti se la maf risulta incerta, se il diaframma è aperto e ci sono limiti compositivi dovuti all'inserimento di un tubo di prolunga .. dall'altra parte hai un sistema che se uno ha bisogno, mantiene l'af e supera il rapp di riproduzione 1:1 con più possibilità compositive (imho) |
| sent on May 04, 2020 (20:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Didn't I understand sincerely, in simple terms? Non ho capito sinceramente, in parole povere? |
| sent on May 04, 2020 (20:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ah, I understand now? Ah ho capito ora? |
| sent on May 05, 2020 (7:07) | This comment has been translated
;-) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
16.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
