What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 04, 2020 (13:05) | This comment has been translated
Wonderful! |
| sent on April 04, 2020 (13:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wonderful Meravigliosi |
| sent on April 04, 2020 (13:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful! couple, Rino.
Hello. Bella! coppia, Rino.
Ciao. |
| sent on April 04, 2020 (13:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You ask me if other users have read the caption and gone to watch the other shot.
This is unnatural, the subjects are on two different focal planes, the subject in front should be at least a little blurry as in the other photo. Then it is not necessarily that the maf must fall on the first subject. It depends on a lot of situations. In this case, given the como, in fact it would have been better to have the maf on the first. As you stated there was an error in the shooting phase. Things that happen.
On about the software very well as long as you don't abuse it. Imho. In this case it goes against physics. For me, it's not the best way to exploit it. Just experiment. Mi chiedi se gli altri utenti hanno letto la didascalia e sono andati ad osservare l'altro scatto.
Questo é innaturale, i soggetti sono su due piani focali diversi, il soggetto davanti dovrebbe essere almeno un po' sfocato come nell'altra foto. Poi non è detto che la maf debba per forza cadere sul primo soggetto. Dipende da tante situazioni. In questo caso, vista la compo, in effetti sarebbe stato meglio la maf sul primo. Come hai dichiarato c'è stato un errore in fase di scatto. Cose che capitano.
In merito al software molto bene a patto di non abusarne. Imho. In questo caso va contro la fisica. Per me non è il modo migliore di sfruttarlo. Giusto sperimentare, che penso fosse il tuo intento. |
| sent on April 04, 2020 (14:29) | This comment has been translated
Wonderful, congratulations |
| sent on April 04, 2020 (15:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Albeebo  Grazie Albeeboo |
| sent on April 04, 2020 (15:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great! Emanuele. Ottima! Emanuele. |
| sent on April 04, 2020 (16:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Magnificent congratulations
heo Roberto Magnifica complimenti
ciao Roberto |
| sent on April 05, 2020 (19:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice! Congratulations. ;-)
Hello
Massimo Molto bella! Complimenti. 
Ciao
Massimo |
| sent on April 05, 2020 (21:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A magnificent double capture of two beautiful specimens, beautiful and very detailed shot, congratulations.
Hello ;-) Una magnifica doppia cattura di due stupendi esemplari, bellissimo e dettagliatissimo scatto, complimenti.
Ciao |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
