JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on March 23, 2020 (17:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Massimo, the idea is good, but the result leaves me a little perplexed, because I do not find the title in the image... :-/ Perhaps that sense of "paternal" protection from the tree in the background is missing, or perhaps it is the somewhat messed-up background that distracts from this concept... The shrub in the foreground is a nice delicate detail: maybe it deserved a sharper detachment from the background, but I don't know if even going to 400 mm you could do it with f/5.6... It also depends on how far the background was. Hello, Alberto. Ciao Massimo, l'idea è buona, ma il risultato mi lascia un po' perplesso, perchè non ritrovo il titolo nell'immagine... Manca forse quel senso di protezione "paterna" da parte dell'albero sullo sfondo o forse è lo sfondo un po' incasinato che distoglie da questo concetto... L'arbusto in primo piano è però un bel dettaglio delicato: forse meritava uno stacco più netto dallo sfondo, ma non so se anche andando a 400 mm ci riuscivi con f/5.6... Dipende anche da quanto lontano era lo sfondo e se tu eri già alla minima distanza di messa a fuoco.
sent on March 23, 2020 (17:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I understand Alberto, that the message was not clear I had noticed from the crowding of comments :-D I turned around this shrub that was the only one without brushes in front to have the background with a large beech that peeled it off with the dark background. I was not close to me but it was quite close to the beech in the background compared to the "young man" (for this blurred it is not much); I have another one vertically (with different subjects) with the branches of the "father" going towards the shrub but it is another photo and I have yet to develop it... thanks of the visit ;-) y, Maximus Comprendo Alberto, che il messaggio non fosse chiaro l'avevo notato dall'affollamento di commenti Ho girato intorno a questo arbusto che era l'unico senza sterpaglie davanti per avere lo sfondo con un grande faggio che lo staccasse con lo sfondo scuro. Non ero vicino io ma era abbastanza vicino il faggio sullo sfondo rispetto al "giovanotto" (per questo lo sfocato non è molto); ne ho un'altra in verticale (con soggetti diversi) con i rami del "padre" che vanno verso l'arbusto ma è un'altra foto e devo ancora svilupparla... grazie della visita ciao, Massimo
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
Manca forse quel senso di protezione "paterna" da parte dell'albero sullo sfondo o forse è lo sfondo un po' incasinato che distoglie da questo concetto... 
