What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 15, 2020 (10:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Lorenzo,
impressive management of the 6400 ISO, great! Ciao Lorenzo,
impressionante la gestione dei 6400 ISO, bravissimo! |
| sent on January 15, 2020 (10:43) | This comment has been translated
Congratulations!! |
| sent on January 15, 2020 (11:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excellent result, I think.
I can only say that comparing it to your wren always at 6400 4K (but optics fixed manypl.), the scopaiola loses a little, especially on blacks, at least to my eye and my monitor.
The difference is minimal and negligible, confirming the unassailable workflow in any case.
But I seem to understand that if you were to recover something (black or white) Sony overwhelms.
right? Risultato eccellente, mi pare.
Posso solo dire che confrontandolo con il tuo scricciolo sempre a 6400 4K (però ottica fissa moltipl.), la scopaiola perde un pò, soprattutto sui neri, almeno al mio occhio e al mio monitor.
La differenza è minima e trascurabile, a conferma dell'inattaccabile flusso di lavoro in ogni caso.
Però mi sembra di aver capito che se si dovesse recuperare qualcosa (neri o bianchi che siano) Sony stravince.
Giusto? |
| sent on January 15, 2020 (11:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Then.... I did the review I had promised , not omitting anything... This scopaiola has minor critical issues... The wren was stationary, she was laid half a second... this is not the best possible result at 6400, let's be clear, but for the impromptu moment it was valid for the test... Put simply with 5D, I would never have focused it... The Sony file is less malleable than that of the 5DmkIV but has twice as many pixels.... there is not an unbridgeable gap with accrosis in the post, while I find nikon D850 and 5DsR very detached as ductility Allora....ho fatto la recensione che avevo promesso , non omettendo niente...questa scopaiola ha delle lievi criticità...lo scricciolo era fermo, lei è rimasta posata mezzo secondo...questo non è il miglior risultato possibile a 6400, sia ben chiaro, ma per l'estemporaneità del momento era valida per il test...in parole povere con la 5D non l'avrei mai messa a fuoco...il file Sony è meno malleabile di quello della 5DmkIV ma ha il doppio dei pixels....non cè cmq un divario incolmabile con delle accrotezze in post, mentre trovo nikon D850 e 5DsR molto staccate come duttilità |
| sent on January 15, 2020 (11:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
All very comprehensive
Thank you Tutto molto esauriente
Grazie |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
