dirty sensor | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Journalism/Street

15.9 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Mirrorless View gallery (8 photos)

dirty sensor sent on January 01, 2020 (10:36) by BurtBaccara. 8 comments, 913 views.

at 16mm, 1/160 f/18.0, ISO 400, hand held.

View High Resolution 15.9 MP

3 persons like it: Gionskj, Tanorusso, Uccio 88

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Gionskj

sent on January 01, 2020 (10:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Unfortunately it happens more often than one expects
good year

Tonysuper

sent on January 02, 2020 (13:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

f18 on m43 is very closed and the stain is very large.
I think more of a speck on the back of the lens than a stain on the sensor (which has a more characteristic, ring shape).

BurtBaccara

sent on January 02, 2020 (14:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=3428625&l=it
considering that the lens is on the lower left maybe chipped (externally) you're probably right, how about?

Tonysuper

sent on January 02, 2020 (14:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The test of the nine is to try another lens.
Photograph a closed diaphragm white wall (or sheet of paper), blurring and using long raw times.
On lightroom there is a tool that makes you see a black and white image with dirt stains.

BurtBaccara

sent on January 02, 2020 (14:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

We're going bad.
1) I don't have any other lenses
2) I don't have lightroom
3) I can't handle the RAW

BurtBaccara

sent on January 02, 2020 (15:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

here www.juzaphoto.com/hr.php?t=3429823&r=5877&l=it the picture he took on a white miro the guy who sold me the car.
the strange thing is that the stain to him is seen at the bottom left and in my sky is in the top right (or maybe a little bit even right at the bottom..... looking better.)
Tonight I'm going to try to take the picture on the paper.

BurtBaccara

sent on January 02, 2020 (18:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I took the pictures on the white sheet
https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=3430174&l=it

https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=3430173&l=it
Are they useful?

BurtBaccara

sent on January 03, 2020 (14:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

As suggested this morning, I took pictures of the wall in the office.
one soon with little sun in fact is darker, the other later against a different wall.
in the first you can see the two shadows/point, in the second you do not see anything.
1) www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=3431215&l=it
2) www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=3431216&l=it

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.