RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Landscape (wilderness)
  4. » Skogafoss waterfall B & W

 
Skogafoss waterfall B & W...

Paesaggi

View gallery (21 photos)

Skogafoss waterfall B & W sent on January 10, 2013 (10:57) by _massi_. 8 comments, 512 views.

at 35mm, 1/3 f/25.0, ISO 100, tripod. Skogafoss waterfall, Iceland.


View High Resolution 3.2 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on January 10, 2013 (12:01)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Critiche e commenti sono sempre benvenuti!!!!

Criticisms and comments are always welcome!!

avatarjunior
sent on January 10, 2013 (12:59)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Mi piacerebbe darti consigli, ma non ne sono capace!!!! MrGreen

Forse guardando la composizione avrei fotografato meno prato in primo piano, anche se effettivamente con la regola dei terzi le linee le cascata, dell'orizzonte e la congiunzione fra prato e acqua vanno bene.
Magari avrei dato più enfasi alle nuvole e al bianco dell'acqua facendo un pò di prove in PP ed eliminato le macchie di polvere nel cielo.

Magari aspetta un cosiglio da qualcuno che ci capisce veramente! MrGreen MrGreen MrGreen

I'd like to give you advice, but I'm capable of!! :-D

Perhaps looking at the composition I photographed less grass in the foreground, even where the rule of thirds lines the waterfall, the horizon and the link between grass and water are fine.
Maybe I would have given more emphasis to the clouds and the white water doing some tests in PP and removed the dust spots in the sky.

Maybe wait a TIP OF from someone who really understands! :-D:-D:-D

avatarjunior
sent on January 10, 2013 (13:43)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


grazie mike, come detto sopra ogni commento e critica è sempre il benvenuto..per quanto riguarda il cielo sono assolutamente d'accordo con te ma purtroppo piu di cosi non sono riuscito a tirar fuori perche era un'unico blocco grigio e piatto (dalla foto non si vedere ma stava piovendo leggermente e c'era anche un po di foschia)..per quanto riguarda l'acqua pure hai ragione, un po più di bianco non avrebbe fatto male...grazie anche per i consigli sulla compo (proverò a rivederla in pp)
un saluto

thanks mike, as mentioned above every comment and criticism is always welcome .. for the sky I absolutely agree with you more than that but unfortunately I could not get out because it was a single block gray and flat (the Photos do not see but it was raining lightly and there was also a bit of haze) .. as well as the water you're right, a little more than white would not hurt ... thanks for the advice on the composition ( I'll try to see her again in pp)
a greeting

avatarjunior
sent on January 10, 2013 (19:08)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Allora aspetto l'evoluzione! MrGreen

Then look evolution! :-D

avatarjunior
sent on January 11, 2013 (9:37)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


ecco la versione rifatta seguendo i consigli di Mike...scurito le ombre, lavorato sul flusso d'acqua per renderla piu chiara e diminuito il rumore su tutta l'immagine...il cielo lasciato cosi come era (non si poteva fare niente di piu9 e ho lasciato la compo inalterata (ho provato a croppare ma per rispettare le proporsioni ma era un ritaglio troppo invadendte)





saluti

here is the version rebuilt following the advice of Mike ... darkened the shadows, working on the flow of water to make it more clear and reduced noise throughout the image ... the sky so left as it was (you could not do anything of piu9 and I left the composition unchanged (I tried to crop but to comply with the proporsioni but it was a cut too invadendte)





greetings

avatarjunior
sent on January 17, 2013 (20:07)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Così effettivamente mi piace di più, c'è più contrasto fra acqua e rocce.
Poi è sempre un mio personale e modesto giudizio. MrGreen
Per il cielo o per le aree che voglio risaltare di più senza agire su altre zone che non necessitano di un ulteriore intervento, io di solito uso la funzione brucia o scherma agendo sulle ombre mezzitoni e luci.
Saluti. Michele.

So actually I like most, there is more contrast between water and rocks.
It's always my personal and humble opinion. :-D
For heaven or for areas that want to stand out more without acting on other areas that do not require further action, I usually use the function burns or dodges acting on the shadows midtones and highlights.
Greetings. Michele.

avatarjunior
sent on January 18, 2013 (9:53)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


grazie ancora mike...anche io normalmente faccio come fai tu con il cielo, ma qui credimi c'era poco fare...avrei forse migliorato qualche cosa usando la doppia esposizione ma ormai è troppo tardi..cmq con i tui consigli anche io trovo la foto migliorata..un saluto
massi

thanks again mike ... also I normally do like you do with the sky, but believe me there was not much to do here ... I might have something better using the double exposure, but it is too late .. cmq with tui tips also I find the photo improved a greeting ..
rocks

avatarsenior
sent on June 03, 2013 (22:55)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


che meraviglia !!! ottimo il bianco e nero, rende bene !!! complimenti, un saluto

what a treat! excellent black and white, it makes good! congratulations, greetings


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me