What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 25, 2019 (18:46) | This comment has been translated
Wonderful! |
| sent on October 25, 2019 (19:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Francesco and Luigi.Ne I have so many and almost all the same :-D :-P that I try to do exposure experiments with zero contrast and diaphragms closed in shooting very early morning. I don't know if the PP is fine but I try. Grazie Francesco e Luigi.Ne ho talmente tanti e quasi tutti uguali che provo a fare esperimenti di esposizione con contrasto zero e diaframmi chiusi in riprese di primissima mattina.Non so se la PP va bene ma ci provo. |
| sent on October 25, 2019 (20:51) | This comment has been translated
Really nice, congratulations! |
| sent on October 25, 2019 (21:46)
Wonderful specimen, beautiful portrait, precision and sharpness of the image with a beautiful background! |
| sent on November 03, 2019 (16:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Luigi and Pawel Grazie Luigi e Pawel |
| sent on November 11, 2019 (20:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Once in a thousand compliments. The sharpness of this photo is amazing!! Una volta in più mille complimenti. La nitidezza di questa foto è incredibile!! |
| sent on November 18, 2019 (11:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much Eigreg! I always said that the trecentino in detail is better than the thundredone! Sometimes the price deceives! Grazie mille Eigreg! Lo dicevo sempre che il trecentino in dettaglio è meglio del trecentone! A volte il prezzo inganna! |
| sent on November 18, 2019 (16:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
... in fact this photo confirms in full! However, few people claim that trecentino is better than the trecentione ...in effetti questa foto conferma in pieno! Sono poche però le voci che sostengono che il trecentino sia meglio del trecentone |
| sent on November 18, 2019 (17:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It can not be better I agree since in a photo you do not only evaluate the extreme sharpness then it also has more functions the trecentone like the VR and the 2.8 which means greater SPEED AF over everything. Hello Non può essere meglio sono d'accordo poiché in una foto non si valuta solo la nitidezza estrema poi ha anche più funzioni il trecentone come il VR e il 2,8 che vuol dire maggiore velocità AF oltre tutto. Ciao |
| sent on November 25, 2019 (19:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I ask another question maybe stupid, but this goal I saw that has the diaphragm dial. So do the diaphragms manually adjust to the lens even on modern machines or the machine controls and the manual diaphragm at that point is no longer used? Faccio un'altra domanda forse stupida, ma questo obiettivo ho visto che ha la ghiera dei diaframmi. Quindi i diaframmi si regolano manualmente sull'obiettivo anche sulle macchine moderne o la macchina comanda e il diaframma manuale a quel punto non si usa più? |
| sent on November 25, 2019 (20:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is a goal style manual cameras when still the automatisms of the diaphragm and times were adjusted only by hand and therefore you had to set the diaphragms on the openings marked on the barrel. If I am not mistaken in the late 1960s, automatic reflexes appeared as a priority of times or diaphragms. At this point there was the revolution that forced to keep the closure to f32 and the force of the automatic adjustment thought, during the click, to open to the chosen value. This 300 precisely must be kept closed to f32 and even has a block at that value that can be activated and deactivated. Today it would no longer make sense to build the objectives with the diaphragms marked on the barrel in fact in the G series the indications are gone. E' un obiettivo stile macchine fotografiche manuali quando ancora gli automatismi del diaframma e tempi si regolavano solo a mano e quindi si dovevano impostare i diaframmi sulle aperture segnate sul barilotto.Se non sbaglio verso la fine degli anni sessanta apparvero le reflex automatiche a priorità di tempi o diaframmi. A questo punto ci fu la rivoluzione che obbligava a tenere la chiusura a f32 e la forza della regolazione automatica pensava, durante lo scatto, ad aprire al valore scelto. Questo 300 appunto va tenuto chiuso a f32 e addirittura ha un blocco a quel valore attivabile e disattivabile. Oggi non avrebbe più senso costruire gli obiettivi con i diaframmi segnati sul barilotto infatti nella serie G le indicazioni sono sparite. |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |