JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on September 18, 2011 (16:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm sorry but the photo does not convince me for these reasons: File-compression: 117kbyte weight are very few x the site (see artifacts) -Glass image -raggio/radius you chose during the sharpening that has enraged halos and artifacts at the edges -Uncertain composition with too many cuts -Difficult the identification of a point of maf causes the resume point How I would have done without personal interpretation of some of the tubes, the frame and rotated slightly more closed the iris looking for a close-up. hello and good light, laurel scusami ma la foto non mi convince per questi motivi: -compressione file : 117kbyte di peso sono molto pochi x il web (vedi artefatti) -immagine vetrosa -raggio/radius da te scelto durante la maschera di contrasto che ha esasperato gli aloni e gli artefatti sui contorni -composizione incerta con troppi tagli -difficile l'individuazione di un punto di maf causa il punto di ripresa Come interpretazione personale avrei fatto a meno di qualche tubo, ruotato leggermente l'inquadratura e chiuso di più il diaframma alla ricerca di un close-up. ciao e buona luce, lauro
sent on September 18, 2011 (17:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The file is taken directly from a give without any mediation in PP, with regard to suggestions about the depth of field in this shot I did not care, I have other shots of the same subject at F11, but I preferio this because of the sensitivity of the whole . Thanks for the comments and suggestions which I appreciate. Il file è tratto direttamente da una dia senza alcuna mediazione in PP, per quanto riguarda i suggerimenti riguardo la profondità di campo in questo scatto non mi interessava, ho altri scatti del medesimo soggetto ad F11, ma ho preferio questa per la delicatezza dell'insieme. Grazie per i commenti ed i suggerimenti che apprezzo.