JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 22, 2019 (12:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not know the subject so it may be that it is so of his, but frankly it seems to me that despite 15 shots to shoot the subject the result is not good I see it to my little-defined monitor. I'll give myself a hint. Since you have chosen the technique of an fs, it would be better to continue the number of shots to try to have more readable the subject, otherwise considering that you operated with the tubes choose a part of the body putting only this in evidence, for example only the head , or the latter with a part of the chest. Non conosco il soggetto quindi può essere che sia così di suo, però francamente mi sembra che nonostante 15 scatti per riprendere il soggetto il risultato non sia buono lo vedo al mio monitor poco definito. Mi permetto un suggerimento. Visto che hai scelto la tecnica di un fs, sarebbe meglio continuare il numero degli scatti per cercare d'avere più leggibile il soggetto, altrimenti considerando che hai operato con i tubi scegliere una parte del corpo mettendo solo questo in evidenza, ad esempio solo il capo, oppure quest'ultimo con una parte del torace.
sent on October 22, 2019 (14:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Pigi47 Hello and thank you for coming by. This photo, along with the others in my gallery, are the first macro photos I've made. I'm still learning and I'm still looking for the macro set to suit my needs. I thank you for the valuable advice that I will put into practice as soon as I find another subject that lends itself to the technique of fs. If you want to look at the other photos in the gallery I invite you to look at the neurotter where I actually focused on the head and chest. Probably with a few more shots I would have focused the wings as well. but I don't know if it is actually possible to focus on the furthest part of the insect by using a focal set in tot millimeters and playing only with the manual maf. Thank you for your advice and your visit! @Pigi47
Ciao e grazie di essere passato. Questa foto, insieme alle altre della mia galleria, sono le prime foto macro che ho realizzato. Sto ancora imparando e sto ancora cercando il corredo macro adatto alle mie esigenze.
Ti ringrazio dei preziosi consigli che metterò in pratica non appena troverò un altro soggetto che si presti alla tecnica del fs.
Se ti va di guardare le altre foto della galleria ti invito a visionare quella del neurottero dove effettivamente ho messo a fuoco il capo ed il torace. Probabilmente con qualche scatto in più avrei messo a fuoco anche le ali.. ma non so se effettivamente sia possibile mettere a fuoco la parte più lontana dell'insetto utilizzando una focale settata a tot millimetri e giocando soltanto con la maf manuale.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
11.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
