Milky Way to Pointe du Raz

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

22.1 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Bretagna View gallery (9 photos)

Milky Way to Pointe du Raz sent on September 16, 2019 (21:00) by DCph. 7 comments, 358 views.

, 15 sec f/1.8, ISO 1600, tripod.

View High Resolution 22.1 MP

5 persons like it: Elias Piccioni, Esse, Francesco I., Lamahd, Matteo1

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Francesco I.

sent on October 09, 2019 (9:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

This idea is certainly noteworthy and not bad as a result. sure is that at 17mm you could have held much more than 15 seconds! I don't quite know how you calculate the equivalent focal from m4/3, but surely 15 seconds is not the time limit. you would have had a much better noise signal ratio.
congratulations anyway and have a good day!

DCph	sent on October 09, 2019 (10:41) \| This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original) The 17mm equals a 34mm on FF Il 17mm equivale a un 34mm su FF

Francesco I.

sent on October 09, 2019 (12:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

:-o o'shreo then I apologize! :-|
You were already on the edge! But then it's an almost impossible feat to do nightly landscapes with m4/3. Unless you use a 10mm or lower yet!

DCph

sent on October 09, 2019 (12:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well there are definitely more wide-angle aootics.
It's that currently this 17mm is the brightest I've... :-D
But there are also 7mm linear f2
Col M4/3 you can do anything ... It's a great system...

Francesco I.

sent on October 09, 2019 (12:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

If I am not mistaken, the focal ratio is also calculated in equivalence. 17 1.8 in itself is a great lens!
7mm becomes 14 which is already a super wide angle. Nice work anyway!

DCph

sent on October 09, 2019 (16:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

“ If I am not mistaken, the focal ratio is also calculated in equivalence. 17 1.8 in itself is a great lens!
7mm becomes 14 which is already a super wide angle. Nice work anyway! „

The brightness of the lens does not change... 1.8 is and 1.8 remains...

Francesco I.

sent on October 09, 2019 (16:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I thought it was also the brightness, but it's really just the depth of field that's equivalent, right?

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.